Sadly, Arthur Topham has been found guilty of a speech/thought crime.
The befuddled jury found him guilty on one charge of ‘wilfully promoting hatred’ of Jews, but innocent on the other, which makes little sense.
Hate is an emotion which, like love, cannot be legislated out of existence.
Making ‘hate’ illegal is an absurd Orwellian concept and Stalinist fantasy.
Hate cannot even be properly defined, it is all a matter of interpretation. Hence why every hate speech trial to have ever been brought before Canada’s courts has been a complete farce based on flimsy and ill-defined criteria.
Canada’s courts actually convict people of expressing emotions and promulgating opinions, theories and even facts that some insecure people find offensive.
Such people cannot combat the speech they dislike with facts or counter-evidence, since they have none, so they resort to state censorship and harassment.
This particular case and most all so-called ‘hate speech’ cases in Canada and the West in general are instigated by intolerant Jewish extremists with totalitarian cultural proclivities.
The leading architects behind Canada’s, Australia’s and Europe’s ‘hate laws’ are organized Jewish groups.
A Jewish-Zionist MP and lawyer in Canada, Irwin Cotler, made his career out of promoting hate speech laws, citing his Jewish cultural upbringing as his motivation for doing so. A Times of Israel article on the subject noted that Cotler “traces his lifelong commitment to fighting hate speech and incitement to the foundational Jewish values he got from his parents.” The article further revealed that Cotler
began working on hate speech in 1965 as a law student at McGill University, where his dean Maxwell Cohen headed the first and only Canadian commission on hate propaganda. As a young lawyer, he served as special assistant to minister of justice John Turner who in 1968 drafted the first Canadian anti-hate legislation, prohibiting the promotion of hatred and contempt against an identifiable group. As an academic, he chose to specialize in hate speech.
Even Ezra Levant, a Canadian Jewish supremacist and pro-Israel propagandist, admitted on television that Organized Jewry have led and continue to lead the hate speech lobby in Canada.
Why should Canadians and Europeans submit to these manic Old Testament fundamentalists and bow to their skewed moral codes which make Gentiles second class citizens in their own countries?
Copyright 2015 Non-Aligned Media
Nov 5, 2015
- VIDEO — Anti Nuclear Sadist On Why Fukushima is A Extinction Event
- VIDEO — Fukushima Fallout thenuclearproctologist 2nd Court Apperance Gets Crazy
- Anti-nuclear firebrand’s case heads to Canadian court over death threats against Fukushima environmental scientists
- “Worst Ever”: Alarm over shocking crash of salmon population in Pacific Northwest — “Very frightening… Pathetic… Grave… Disastrous… Non-existent” — Official calls for immediate government action — “Something majorly wrong is happening in our oceans”
- VIDEO — Dana Durnford & Terry Daniels – Proof Radiation Is KILLING The Pacific]
The University of Victoria B.C. CANADA and Woods Hole oceanographic Institution had me silenced and arrested .
Please support me in this unrepresented attack upon your liberty and your freedom of speech and donate at paypal https://www.paypal.com/ca/webapps/mpp… by typing in my email firstname.lastname@example.org or use credit card at my site thenuclearproctologist.org its a big company handling those transaction so its very reliable . http://www.thenuclearproctologist.org/
Chat room & info by and for the Fukushima Hounds . http://fukushimahounds.freeforums.net/
Fukushima Reactors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
“Plutopia: Nuclear Families, American Plutonium Disasters” Kate Brown http://www.booktv.org/Watch/15010/Plu…
Battle for humanity nearly lost: global food supply deliberately engineered to end life, not nourish it
Fukushima triggers jump in airline pilot/passenger heart attacks, cancers, rad symptoms
Leuren Moret: Fukushima radiation made Hawaii Pacific islands unsafe for humans http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PST3Hy…
Is Thunderf00t Fukushima Fallout Illiterate or a Shithead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Qmwk…
by Eve Mykytyn
Five security guards, members of the RCMP, two in bulletproof vests, all entrants pass through metal detectors, undergo a wand search, check all electronics including cell phones and have their bags meticulously scrutinized. Why all the security? The crown was presenting its criminal case against Arthur Topham, for the crime of “hate.’
Section 319 of Canada’s criminal code is an extraordinary law by most western standards. It reads, in relevant part: “(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
The statute does not define hatred, but does provide 4 statutory defenses.
(a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
(b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
(c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
(d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.
It is important to understand that the prosecution (the Crown), with all of its resources, need only prove ‘hate,’ and then the only available defenses are affirmative, meaning that the burden of proof switches to the defense.
MUST WATCH — Canada concludes chemtrails “unscientific theory”, bans anti-chemtrails ads on Toronto subways
via Alfred Lambremont Webre
Oct 16, 2015
Advertising Standards Canada, citing Harper government and environmentalist David Suzuki, concludes chemtrails are an “unscientific theory” and bans anti-chemtrails advertisements from Toronto subways
By Alfred Lambremont Webre
[Potent News editor’s note:
Last Sunday, some British Columbia dads gathered their kids to a public park; a field fit for some father-son soccer time. We’ve reported in the past about America’s unfortunate export to the UK and Canada – police brutality and authoritarianism. Permit-pushing is another problem. Unfortunately, that attitude continues to grow and even mall cops, bureaucrats and bylaw officers want a piece of the power pie.
People are grateful when, during a confrontation, if officers are called they bring resolution to a situation without anyone getting hurt. Not so much when they are the confrontation.
News anchors astutely observed that while bonding in the park away from crime, the “Kids…[got] a very different lesson from a bylaw officer.”
Families are still unsure why they were targeted while playing in the park. The official line is that a permit is required for organized games – obviously, some impromptu and informal soccer does not warrant getting kicked out without a permit. They also couldn’t help but notice that some others were allowed to stay.
A female Surrey officer who seemingly suffers from small-man syndrome, actually called for the back-up of Royal Canadian Mounted Police. She clapped her hands to get their attention like they were all children, gesticulated, and said with an authoritative smile on her face,
Listen to me! I’m in charge here, today, okay?
So today…you will pick up your cones – you will go home.
Full footage of the dads trying in futility to reason with the officers and explain:
I think you will recognize the inflection when she says “okay” – it’s usually only heard from authoritarians, teachers of small children and in comedy. Instead of resolution, all activity was shut down for lack of unnecessary papers.
via Rebel Media
Aug 13, 2015
via The Vigilant Christian
Aug 13, 2015
via Corbet Report
Jul 29, 2015
O Canada! The land of Mounties and beavers and hockey and…hate speech tribunals? Yes, it’s no secret that Canada is no friend of free speech, and as citizens get fined for criticizing police and lawyers get prosecuted for criticizing a government agency, things are only getting worse. Join James in today’s Thought for the Day to find out more.
SHOW NOTES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=15788
Jul 2, 2013
Taken from the Joe Rogan Experience #82 with Dave Foley (http://bit.ly/12XSWUo), also available for download via iTunes.
via Press For Truth
Jun 29, 2015
Canadians can now be detained if they advocate or promote “terrorism offences in general.” In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth shows how this bill will be used to attempt to silence the new alternative media.
via Press For Truth
May 11, 2015
When Stephen Harper gave a prepared speech to the Israel parliament last year, he equated lack of support for Israel with anti-Semtism. He said: “[T]his is the face of the new anti-Semitism. It targets the Jewish people by targeting Israel and attempts to make the old bigotry acceptable for a new generation. Of course, criticism of Israeli government policy is not in and of itself necessarily anti-Semitic. But what else can we call criticism that selectively condemns only the Jewish state and effectively denies its right to defend itself, while systematically ignoring – or excusing – the violence and oppression all around it?”