HIGHLY POTENT NEWS THAT MIGHT CHANGE YOUR VIEWS

news

Ron Paul Town Hall Gets Occupied (video)

YouTube – eyehateevil1
November 21, 2011


(hat tip: Infowars)


DOJ Wants To Criminalize Uploading You Tube Videos

Racketeering charges for violating website’s terms of service

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars
November 15, 2011

The Department of Justice is attempting to criminalize uploading videos that break You Tube’s terms of service, along with any other online action that is deemed to contravene a website’s usage policy, in a shocking expansion of cybersecurity laws deemed draconian by critics.

“In a statement obtained by CNET that’s scheduled to be delivered tomorrow, the Justice Department argues that it must be able to prosecute violations of Web sites’ often-ignored, always-unintelligible “terms of service” policies,” writes Declan McCullagh.

Such violations would include creating a fake Facebook profile, lying about your weight on dating websites, or providing any other item of false information that violates a website’s TOS agreement.

FULL ARTICLE HERE…
(hat tip: Activist Post)


Uh oh, global warming loons: here comes Climategate II!

James Delingpole
London Telegraph
November 22, 2011

Breaking news: two years after the Climategate, a further batch of emails has been leaked onto the internet by a person – or persons – unknown. And as before, they show the “scientists” at the heart of the Man-Made Global Warming industry in a most unflattering light. Michael Mann, Phil Jones, Ben Santer, Tom Wigley, Kevin Trenberth, Keith Briffa – all your favourite Climategate characters are here, once again caught red-handed in a series of emails exaggerating the extent of Anthropogenic Global Warming, while privately admitting to one another that the evidence is nowhere near as a strong as they’d like it to be.

In other words, what these emails confirm is that the great man-made global warming scare is not about science but about political activism. This, it seems, is what motivated the whistleblower ‘FOIA 2011′ (or “thief”, as the usual suspects at RealClimate will no doubt prefer to tar him or her) to go public.

I particularly like the ones expressing deep reservations about the narrative put about by the IPCC:

/// The IPCC Process ///

<1939> Thorne/MetO:

Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical
troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a
wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the
uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these
further if necessary […]

<3066> Thorne:

I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it
which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.

<1611> Carter:

It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter how much
talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the eleventh hour by
a select core group.

<2884> Wigley:

Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive […] there have been a number of
dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC […]

<4755> Overpeck:

The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s
included and what is left out.

<3456> Overpeck:

I agree w/ Susan [Solomon] that we should try to put more in the bullet about
“Subsequent evidence” […] Need to convince readers that there really has been
an increase in knowledge – more evidence.  What is it?

And here’s our friend Phil Jones, apparently trying to stuff the IPCC working groups with scientists favourable to his cause, while shutting out dissenting voices.

<0714> Jones:

Getting people we know and trust [into IPCC] is vital – hence my comment about
the tornadoes group.

<3205> Jones:

Useful ones [for IPCC] might be Baldwin, Benestad (written on the solar/cloud
issue – on the right side, i.e anti-Svensmark), Bohm, Brown, Christy (will be
have to involve him ?)

FULL ARTICLE HERE…
(hat tip: Activist Post & Infowars)


The Brave New World of Genetically Modifying a ‘New Human Species’

Brandon Turbeville
Infowars.com
November 11, 2011

If some of the information emerging from the technology, governmental, and academic worlds are any indication, not only is the police state here; the scientific dictatorship is right around the corner. Indeed, if recent comments made by Juan Enriquez are indicative of the coming state merger between technology and genetics, we have much to be concerned about.

For those that are unfamiliar with Enriquez, he may not be the most flashy of the science superstars currently on the scene, but he is not exactly a nobody either. Enriquez was the founding director of the Harvard Business School Life Sciences Project and is currently chairman and CEO of Biotechonomy LLC., a “life sciences research and investment firm” and managing director of Excel Venture Management. He is the author of numerous books, including As The Future Catches You: How Genomics And Other Forces Are Changing Your Life, Work, Health, and Wealth and The Untied States of America: Polarization, Fracturing, and Our Future.

Enriquez also serves on the boards of Cabot Corporation, The Harvard Medical School Genetics Advisory Council, The Chairman’s International Council of the America’s Society, the Visiting Committee of Harvard’s David Rockefeller Center, Tuft University’s EPIIC, and Harvard Business School’s PAPSAC.

FULL ARTICLE HERE…


Foster Children Given Harmful Antipsychotics and Tranquilizers as Frequently as Mentally Disabled

Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post
November 22, 2011

Young children in foster care are being given antipsychotics just as frequently as children considered to be the most mentally disabled, according to a new report.

The drugs that the foster children are being dosed up with are powerful antipsychotic drugs traditionally given to schizophrenics – the same drugs that even mainstream health official are now speaking out against.

The report, published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, examined how often young children in foster care are given two antipsychotic drugs at once. While some drugs include Risperdal, Seroqueland, and Zyprexa, some of these young children are also given major tranquilizers, which were originally developed to ‘treat’ schizophrenia but are now used as all-purpose drugs for almost any psychiatric syndrome.

Antipsychotics and other mental illness drugs given out like candy despite suicide link

As the pharmaceutical experts in the report admit, these foster children are simply being loaded up with antipsychotics with almost zero medical basis.

‘The kids in foster care may come from bad homes, but they do not have the sort of complex medical issues that those in the disabled population do,’ said Susan dosReis, an associate professor in the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy and the lead author.

It is important to note that the usage of antipsychotic drugs has been found to result in a number of known dangers as well as even more concerning unknown dangers. In fact, many pharmaceuticals intended to ‘treat’ suicide can actually lead to suicide. However, suicide is not the only side effect of these drugs. There is significant research linking usage to childhood diabetes, an increased risk of depression, and weight gain.

More than 1 in 10 Americans are now taking suicide-linked antidepressants, and that number continues to climb as half of all Americans are expected to be diagnosed with at least one mental illness in their lifetime. Foster children are being given these drugs in excessive doses in unison with powerful tranquilizers, all in an attempt to make them more manageable for foster workers.

For years it has been known that foster children are among the most abused in the world, and mind-altering pharmaceutical abuse may be one of the worst kinds of such abuse. 

Please visit Natural Society for more great health news and vaccine information.


No Privacy on DC Roads, High-Tech Cameras “Pinpoint People’s Movements All Over Town”

Activist Post
November 22, 2011

Since the pilot program began in 2004, hundreds of high-tech, license-plate-reading cameras have been deployed in the District of Columbia area that can archive and “pinpoint people’s movements all over town.”

The Washington Post reports that, “More than 250 cameras in the District and its suburbs scan license plates in real time,” making it the highest concentration of these big brother tools in the nation with one camera per square mile.

At a cost to the taxpayer of $20,000 per camera, they are said to be able to capture license “numbers across four lanes of traffic on cars zooming up to 150 mph,” collecting around 1,800 images a minute and over 1 million data points per month.

Sgt. Robert Alessi, of the Virginia State Police, said the “Fixed cameras will help us use a net instead of one fishing pole with one line in the water waiting to get a nibble.”

Authorities claim that they have been helpful in finding stolen cars faster, tracking down killers and, in some cases, adulterers. However, there has been essentially no public debate or even disclosure about this “vast system that tracks the comings and goings of anyone driving around the District.”

“The government has no business collecting that kind of information on people without a warrant,” said Jay Stanley, of the ACLU’s technology and liberty program.

While the U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing the constitutionality of police using GPS surveillance without warrants, this new technology has yet to even be discussed seven years after its initial launch.

“It’s big brother,” said Orin Kerr, a law professor at George Washington University. “This technology could be used for good and it could be used for bad. I think we need a conversation about whether and how this technology is used.”

The concerns about privacy arise due to the sophistication of the technology; operators can take a picture of every license plate that passes by and instantly analyze them against a database, determining where any vehicle has been and when. “Detectives also can enter a be-on-the-lookout into the database, and the moment that license plate passes a detector, they get an alert.”

These big brother devices are not limited to the Washington D.C. area and are expanding to nearly every corner of America. It makes one wonder how long it will be until these real-time cameras also contain facial recognition technology.

Of course, the same motto is rolled out anytime technology seems to infringe on privacy: “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you’re not driving a stolen car, you’re not committing a crime, then you don’t have anything to worry about,” espoused Sgt. Robert Alessi.


“Second Revolution” Rocks Egypt

Military reneges on Wall Street mandates, gets second wave of protests aimed at them.

Tony Cartalucci
Land Destroyer
November 21, 2011

November 21, 2011 – After playing a role Wall Street and London meddlers had hoped would translate into the Egyptian military holding the bag while corporate-fascists like those escorted through Cairo by John McCain in June 2011 filled it with Egypt’s wealth, it seems as if the Egyptian military, through the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCARF) has gotten cold feet. Perhaps through pangs of nationalism or at least a realistic appraisal of their own future, trading places with the now fully betrayed Hosni Mubarak or Muammar Qaddafi verses their best self-interests, the military, despite grandiose promises to usher in Wall Street and London’s “democratic reforms,” including the implementation of a constitution literally written by George Soros-funded think tanks, have laid these measures thoroughly, and entirely to the wayside.

With predictable exactitude, the very same protesters, led by the very same US-created April 6 youth movement and Muslim Brotherhood, have once again poured into the streets to either get the military back on the right, Wall Street/London approved track, or as Council on Foreign Relations “fellow” Steve Cook hopes, oust the military from power all together. Al Arabiya News has recently reported that the April 6 youth movement, “would stay in Tahrir Square and continue sit-ins in other cities until its demands were met, including a call for a presidential vote no later than April.” The Muslim Brotherhood has also taken a vocal lead in the protests – a move that should not surprise anyone aware of the US-backed nature of the Arab Spring, consuming nations from Tunisia to Syria and everywhere in between.

Waiting in the wings for this eventual collapse and the expedited presidential elections April 6 is “fighting for,” is US-backed Mohammed ElBaradei, another “Nobel Peace Prize” carrying imposter, along side President Barack Obama, and Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi, bent in perpetual servitude to the corporate-fascist agenda of Wall Street and London. ElBaradei has faced severe PR challenges as Egyptians and indeed people around the world learned of his deep ties to Washington despite his attempt at portraying himself as “at odds” with the West. At one point, ElBaradei, after leading the US-engineered “Arab Spring” through his native home of Egypt, had rocks hurdled at him months later, with angry mobs calling him “an American agent.”

Predictably the West came to his rescue using the now fully exhausted ploy of planting “Wikileaks” documents “revealing” just how contemptible the West saw ElBaradei in an attempt to rehabilitate his image as “anti-West” and therefore “pro-Arab” and thus more likely to be able to foist the US agenda upon Egyptians. More recently, and perhaps the most ludicrous attempt yet to paint ElBaradei as anything but an agent of the West, was when Israel accused him of being an “Iranian agent” instead. Of course, ElBaradei literally sits on the board of trustees of the same US corporate-funded think-tank, the International Crisis Group, as several of Israel’s most prominent political and financial figures including the Israeli President himself, Shimon Peres.

That April 6 was waiting at the airport in Cairo (and subsequently arrested) in 2010 for ElBaradei’s return to Egypt, after the youth movement had received training via the US State Department in New York a full two years earlier, is highly significant. April 6, along with Google’s Wael Ghonim would spend 2010 building up ElBaradei’s “National Front for Change” for the coming January 25, 2011 Egyptian revolution. As this premeditated, US-engineered unrest unfolded, many of the media organizations complicit in the US State Department’s planning of the “Arab Spring” feinted surprise and confusion claiming that these events were entirely spontaneous, triggered by neighboring unrest in Tunisia (which was also premeditated by the West years in advance) and entirely indigenous in nature.

That April 6 is now back in Tahrir Square, with their man ElBaradei still lurking in Egypt’s political underbrush bidding his time, and as violence starts all over again, it appears something has gone awry with the West’s heavy investments in the Egyptian military. The US is still in fact funding the Egyptian military, perhaps in a bid to bring out officers more willing to take short-term Western incentives at the cost of inevitable long-term consequences. It is also likely this continued funding plays as the carrot to the US State Department-funded street mobs’ stick to get the military to move forward and accept Wall Street/London mandates regarding Egypt.

Such a dichotomy of incentives and consequences are a reoccurring theme in US foreign policy and have been written about extensively by US policy makers, in particular toward Iran, where economic aid of every kind imaginable is counterbalanced with the threat of everything from fomenting street mobs against the Iranian government, to funding outright terrorism, to even unilateral first strikes against the Islamic Republic. The definitive “handbook” of overthrowing an entrenched targeted regime, Brookings’ “Which Path to Persia?” gives invaluable insight into the mechanics at work now in Egypt.

And finally, as people fret over which side to take, it should be noted that no real revolution of any kind will take place until people both understand the balance of power currently held in the world today and how to change it pragmatically rather than politically. Whether Egypt retains its sovereignty against the Wall Street-funded forces wreaking havoc throughout Cairo’s streets or not, Wall Street itself will remain intact until we see them, not Egyptian generals or street hooligans and dupes as the true enemy, and the systematic boycotting and replacing of their degenerate, global domineering system implemented in full as the solution.