Vancouver, once a city with its own unique spin on Canadian ideals and culture, is well on its way to becoming a vacation city for the world’s rich, its economy transforming into one predicated almost entirely on catering to their luxurious proclivities, and its citizens transformed into modern serfs permitted to live in smaller dwellings on the city’s periphery, if you’ll allow me to exaggerate for effect.
Hyperbole aside, consider this: the nature of serfdom was one where serfs, unable to acquire their own plot of productive land, worked and lived on the land of wealthy nobles whom they served. In Vancouver the average person who owns a detached home made more money from capital gains on their property, roughly $100,000 per year in the last decade or so, than the average Vancouverite made in income, roughly $65,000. At those rates, it’s effectively impossible for average people without seed capital to join in on the boons of the Vancouver property boom, and so their role in the city’s largest source of wealth generation, property ownership, becomes catering to those who can take part, selling to them luxury booze, food, cars, clothes, and even their bodies. We have two classes of society forming along a divide that is growingly difficult to cross.
Canada Sells Weapons to State Sponsor of Terrorism: Class Action Law Suit against Ottawa over $15 Billion Saudi Arms Deal
The Canadian government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is the object of a class action lawsuit in Quebec Superior Court pertaining to the $15 billion sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia. An action in Federal Court is also contemplated.
According to Toronto’s Globe and Mail:
Opponents of Canada’s $15-billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia are taking Ottawa to court in an attempt to block shipments of the combat vehicles, a move that could force the governing Liberals to explain how they justify the sale to a human-rights pariah under weapon-export restrictions.
The action is led by law Professor Daniel Turp together with students of the University of Montreal:
He will announce the legal challenge on Saturday and intends to file it with the Federal Court within three weeks.
Mr. Turp and his group are calling on critics of the deal across the country to rally behind their challenge, which they are calling operation Armoured Rights, pointing to how poorly Saudi Arabia treats its own citizens and the civilian carnage of the Saudi-led bombing campaign in Yemen. (Globe and Mail)
Amply documented, Saudi Arabia is the state sponsor of Al Qaeda affiliated “opposition groups” in Syria including the Islamic State (ISIS). Riyadh –acting in liaison and on behalf of Washington– plays a central role in the financing of the Islamic State (ISIS) as well as the recruitment, training and religious indoctrination of terrorist mercenary forces deployed in Syria and Iraq.
Canadian government orders residents to get rid of their old wood-burning stoves or pay thousands of dollars in fines
via Natural News
by Daniel Barker
Jan 26, 2016
(NaturalNews) In a blatant attack on those who prefer living as self-sufficiently as possible, citizens of Montreal have been ordered to first register their wood-burning stoves, and then ultimately get rid of them within three years, unless they meet rigid air quality standards.
The deadline to register wood-burning stoves and fireplaces in Montreal was December 22, 2015, and the new emissions regulations will be implemented in 2018. Those who refuse to comply will be subject to fines, and those who are willing to adjust will be forced to pay for expensive modifications to their wood-burning stoves and fireplaces.
via CTV News
by Keith Leslie, The Canadian Press
Sep 24, 2015
TORONTO — Ontario lawmakers have approved a motion to remove the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from all government forms to “reflect the diverse nature” of families in the province.
Glenn Thibeault, the Liberal member of the Ontario legislature for Sudbury, asked that ‘gendered’ terminology be replaced with gender-neutral and inclusive language on 10,000 different provincial government forms.
Birth certificates already allow two same-sex adults to be listed as parents, and all government forms should use inclusive language, said Thibeault.
His motion, which was approved Thursday in a voice vote, said gender specific words “including — but not limited to — mother and father” could be replaced with “parent or guardian” to better recognize the rights of LGBTQ parents.
- VIDEO — Major Media Push To Destroy Gender Roles For New World Order
- VIDEO — Gender Neutral Bathrooms Coming to Ottawa Canada Schools !!! THIS IS THE END!
- “Gender Is Over” T-shirt
- PODCAST — Dawn Stefanowicz – The Impact of LGBT Parenting & Children’s Well-Being
- Education department eliminates the terms ‘mother’ and ‘father’ in favor of less gender-specific ‘parent 1’ and ‘parent 2’ ]
[Potent News editor’s note: The banned documentary film “Sodom” mentions this exact change of terminology happening at a school in Milan (37 minutes into the documentary… if you can find it).]
Last night I watched The Big Short — maybe the most important Hollywood film in years. This true story is a powerful and eloquent invitation to wake up to the sheer depravity at the core of the system of commerce.
The fact that the film got nominated for 5 Oscars including Best Picture is a huge sign that there are way more people waking up than we ever thought. The wrongs may not be getting righted as quickly as we’d like, but it is happening.
The reality of this shift is clearly evidenced by this news last week from Ontario. After years of obvious problems, Hydro One finally admitted that rural ‘smart’ meters do not work, and has decided to pull the plug on 36,000 of them — to start. We will see more utilities begin to do likewise. [UPDATE: BC Hydro just announced plans to remove 88,000 meters suspected of failure.]
Costing ratepayers billions, smart meters are actually designed to unlawfully harvest detailed data of the in-home activities of occupants without their knowledge or consent.
As reported by the National Post:
“Astonishing,” was the reaction from Lanark-area MPP Randy Hillier, who has been deluged with complaints about Hydro One billing and smart-meter suspicions.
“I’ve been banging my head against the wall for the last five years, saying we’ve got problems with smart meters in rural Ontario.” Since first being elected in 2007, no single issue has attracted as much attention in his riding, he said.
For the purpose of clarification: at this time Hydro One is not planning to uninstall smart meters and replace with analogs — but rather to manually read rural customers’ meters quarterly, and estimate the months in between, because the wireless reporting is simply not working.
Hydro One was the first major utility in Canada to deploy so-called ‘smart’ meters upon an unsuspecting customer base. The price tag for rollout, paid for by the people of Ontario, was $2 billion — which was $900M over budget.
by Yoichi Shimatsu
Dana Durnford, a former commercial diver who plies a rubber dinghy along the Canadian Pacific coast to study the effects of Fukushima radiation on marine life, has been arrested for making alleged death threats against a chemistry professor at University of Victoria in British Columbia. Mr. Durnford is facing trial on two counts of harassment related to his comments on video at his webpage, the Nuclear Proctologist. The video clips in question have been removed by YouTube at the request of unnamed complainants.
Whatever the substance those controversial statements, Canadians should realize his frustration arises in response to the official campaign of denial of Fukushima’s lethal effects. I have often enjoyed dialogues with Dana on the rense.com radio program on Monday nights, especially stories of his harrowing experiences at sea amid 15-foot swells. After a career of diving for shellfish, he developed a passion for coastal research two years ago after discovering that the once-lush seafloor and tidal pools of British Columbia have been denuded of vegetation and are now devoid of marine-animal life. A burning curiosity prompted him to obtain geiger counters, a microscope and underwater cameras to search for the root cause of this unprecedented natural catastrophe along North America’s Pacific coast,
Durnford has an encyclopedic recall for identifying marine species that few marine biologists can equal. His estimate, four years after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, is that out of more than 2,000 coastal species only about 200 still survive. The absence of any other plausible cause prompted his conclusion that low-level radiation from Fukushima arriving in immense volumes is responsible for the greatest extermination event in human history. His field research shows that the ongoing ecocide of the Pacific is a man-made catastrophe and not a natural disaster, and the nuclear industry bears the entire culpability. For his tireless campaign of gathering a vast body of smoking-gun evidence, Durnford is being persecuted in a modern-day witch trial by the high priests of the nuclear industry.
Durnford stands accused on trumped-up charges of a “hate crime” against those marine chemists who categorically deny radiation as a potential factor in the oceanic kill-off, a priori, that is even before they start to gather data from the shore. As quoted in the Globe and Mail, Durnford said, “in court I was charged with criminal harassment of nuclear industry PR people, and one of those was from Woods Hole and the other one was from UVic, British Columbia, Canada.”
Correction: Durnford is not aware of the fact, and probably neither are the students at University of Victoria, that one of his accusers, Professor Jay Cullen, served as a postdoctoral researcher at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, which throughout its history has been an “ocean environment” research front funded by the U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Research.
“Zero risk” from Fukushima
To be fair, as far as possible when presented with transparent scientific fraud, let us now pay attention to the opinions of the main “victim” of this alleged heinous murder plot.
Just a week ago, we noted the hard-working US government was drawing up plans for “knife regulations.” Well, in The UK it appears to have already begun…
As SHTFPlan.com’s Mac Slavo warns, don’t try to think this one through – the logica fail and sheer volume of absurdity might just make you sick if you do…
For the UK – whose laws and policies all-too-often influence those of the U.S. – gun control isn’t enough. Probably nothing will ever be enough.
Jan 31, 2015
Starring Greg Renouf, Ryan Elson, Tyson Carter, Matthew Duncan, Greg Hill, Terry Wilson and Lucas Cort.
The Radical Left exposes the reality and consequences of left wing ideologies, political corruption, and the political campaigns and professional activists, that are being funded by foreign organizations to destroy Canadian industry and culture by way of an extremely subversive agenda.
Sadly, Arthur Topham has been found guilty of a speech/thought crime.
The befuddled jury found him guilty on one charge of ‘wilfully promoting hatred’ of Jews, but innocent on the other, which makes little sense.
Hate is an emotion which, like love, cannot be legislated out of existence.
Making ‘hate’ illegal is an absurd Orwellian concept and Stalinist fantasy.
Hate cannot even be properly defined, it is all a matter of interpretation. Hence why every hate speech trial to have ever been brought before Canada’s courts has been a complete farce based on flimsy and ill-defined criteria.
Canada’s courts actually convict people of expressing emotions and promulgating opinions, theories and even facts that some insecure people find offensive.
Such people cannot combat the speech they dislike with facts or counter-evidence, since they have none, so they resort to state censorship and harassment.
This particular case and most all so-called ‘hate speech’ cases in Canada and the West in general are instigated by intolerant Jewish extremists with totalitarian cultural proclivities.
The leading architects behind Canada’s, Australia’s and Europe’s ‘hate laws’ are organized Jewish groups.
A Jewish-Zionist MP and lawyer in Canada, Irwin Cotler, made his career out of promoting hate speech laws, citing his Jewish cultural upbringing as his motivation for doing so. A Times of Israel article on the subject noted that Cotler “traces his lifelong commitment to fighting hate speech and incitement to the foundational Jewish values he got from his parents.” The article further revealed that Cotler
began working on hate speech in 1965 as a law student at McGill University, where his dean Maxwell Cohen headed the first and only Canadian commission on hate propaganda. As a young lawyer, he served as special assistant to minister of justice John Turner who in 1968 drafted the first Canadian anti-hate legislation, prohibiting the promotion of hatred and contempt against an identifiable group. As an academic, he chose to specialize in hate speech.
Even Ezra Levant, a Canadian Jewish supremacist and pro-Israel propagandist, admitted on television that Organized Jewry have led and continue to lead the hate speech lobby in Canada.
Why should Canadians and Europeans submit to these manic Old Testament fundamentalists and bow to their skewed moral codes which make Gentiles second class citizens in their own countries?
Copyright 2015 Non-Aligned Media
Nov 5, 2015
- VIDEO — Anti Nuclear Sadist On Why Fukushima is A Extinction Event
- VIDEO — Fukushima Fallout thenuclearproctologist 2nd Court Apperance Gets Crazy
- Anti-nuclear firebrand’s case heads to Canadian court over death threats against Fukushima environmental scientists
- “Worst Ever”: Alarm over shocking crash of salmon population in Pacific Northwest — “Very frightening… Pathetic… Grave… Disastrous… Non-existent” — Official calls for immediate government action — “Something majorly wrong is happening in our oceans”
- VIDEO — Dana Durnford & Terry Daniels – Proof Radiation Is KILLING The Pacific]
The University of Victoria B.C. CANADA and Woods Hole oceanographic Institution had me silenced and arrested .
Please support me in this unrepresented attack upon your liberty and your freedom of speech and donate at paypal https://www.paypal.com/ca/webapps/mpp… by typing in my email email@example.com or use credit card at my site thenuclearproctologist.org its a big company handling those transaction so its very reliable . http://www.thenuclearproctologist.org/
Chat room & info by and for the Fukushima Hounds . http://fukushimahounds.freeforums.net/
Fukushima Reactors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
“Plutopia: Nuclear Families, American Plutonium Disasters” Kate Brown http://www.booktv.org/Watch/15010/Plu…
Battle for humanity nearly lost: global food supply deliberately engineered to end life, not nourish it
Fukushima triggers jump in airline pilot/passenger heart attacks, cancers, rad symptoms
Leuren Moret: Fukushima radiation made Hawaii Pacific islands unsafe for humans http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PST3Hy…
Is Thunderf00t Fukushima Fallout Illiterate or a Shithead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Qmwk…
by Eve Mykytyn
Five security guards, members of the RCMP, two in bulletproof vests, all entrants pass through metal detectors, undergo a wand search, check all electronics including cell phones and have their bags meticulously scrutinized. Why all the security? The crown was presenting its criminal case against Arthur Topham, for the crime of “hate.’
Section 319 of Canada’s criminal code is an extraordinary law by most western standards. It reads, in relevant part: “(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
The statute does not define hatred, but does provide 4 statutory defenses.
(a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
(b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
(c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
(d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.
It is important to understand that the prosecution (the Crown), with all of its resources, need only prove ‘hate,’ and then the only available defenses are affirmative, meaning that the burden of proof switches to the defense.