HIGHLY POTENT NEWS THAT MIGHT CHANGE YOUR VIEWS

Syria

Syria: Cats on the Menu While Death Squads Halt Food Shipments

by Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
November 6, 2013

Last week, Syrian death squads (aka Syrian “rebels”) sent shockwaves of horror through many casual observers when a video was posted to YouTube showing the fighters slaughtering cats for food. The video, which was intended to be used for propaganda purposes, showed the “rebel” fighters after having corralled several domesticated housecats, catching a cat, killing it, and then cooking and eating the feline for the camera. The death squad fighter told the camera how hungry the people of Syria had become that they were resorting to eating cats to survive, as the Syrian military had effectively cut off food to the area.

Although the video did not include the full graphic slaughter, it did show a man beheading a cat, the animal shrieking in terror and pain as he slits its throat, and the subsequent skinning, butchering, cooking, and eating it.

While none of the men in the video openly admitted to being a part of the death squad ranks, the group that posted the video to YouTube calls itself the “South Damascus Media Bureau,” and has, in the past, posted mostly videos of death squads in battle.

Even the dialogue of the individuals featured in the video is quite similar to that seen in countless other death squad produced material. For instance, the narrator of the video states, “To whom don’t believe it, this is the situation of the people in the south of the capital Damascus. The Shiekhs have issued fatwas and the people are now following these fatwas.”

After the man on screen finishes killing the cat, he holds the liver up to the camera and states, “This is the liver. This is the most delicious part of the body.”

The narrator chimes back in and says, “This is the final round, the man is cooking the cat who was slaughtered.”

What would you like to say to the people,” the narrators asks. “What people?” the man responds.
“The people who are watching you now.”

“Only Allah will help us,” the man says. “We told Allah about our problems and that’s it. We told Allah about the Muslims watching us eat cats and doing nothing.”

“May God be with you, have a nice meal,” retorts the narrator.

Later, the narrator sarcastically states, “Thank you for ignoring us and doing nothing about dire humanitarian issues and thank you for caring about us.”

Yet, while it is true that some Damascus imams have issued fatwas allowing the consumption of cats and dogs by starving Syrians, and that food is scarce in areas of heavy fighting around the capital, there are many reasons to believe that the video itself was staged in order to gain sympathy for death squad fighters and drum up anger at the Assad government for allegedly keeping food out of those specific neighborhoods.

In an interview with France 24, even a “pacifist anti-regime activist,” was forced to admit that there were several questionable aspects to the video. The “activist,” Omar, stated,

The video is described as having been filmed in a neighborhood that’s under siege by the army, where there’s no food coming in, and no one is allowed out. You would think that in a situation like this, the residents would be starved and weak. But that’s really not the sense I get from these two men in the video: they look healthy, well-dressed, and cleanly-shaved. They really don’t look like they live in a zone where fierce fighting is taking place. I also noticed that they are cooking the cat in a pot that looks quite new.

The last part of the video struck me as odd: the man eats a little bit of what is in his spoon – supposedly, the cat – then puts it back down in the pot, though there is still meat in the spoon. This is really not behaviour I would expect from a starved man.

France 24 goes even further by stating,

There are other strange details in the video. The footage, which is edited in several parts, doesn’t include any wide shots, making it impossible to identify the place where it was filmed – and whether this is indeed a neighborhood where fighting is taking place. The title of the video is also uncharacteristically vague for Syrian activists’ video, describing the location as only “south” of Damascus. It is also interesting to note that the scene in which the cat is killed seems to have been edited out of the video.

The video was posted online on October 28. The very next day, October 29, was “National Cat Day” in the United States, which aims to promote the adoption of stray cats. If those who filmed these images wanted to create a buzz in the United States, they couldn’t have chosen a better day.

Still, the scarcity of food in contested areas of the country is a very real concern for the people living there. Without a doubt, the assaults being launched by the Syrian army is one contributing factor to the lack of adequate food supply. However, to portray the Syrian army’s attempt to liberate the areas from death squad control as a “blockade” or anything other than a military assault would be dangerously close to propaganda as there is no evidence that the Syrian military is intentionally withholding food from citizens.

The death squads, however, are an entirely different story. While propaganda videos have been created to promote the perception that citizens and death squads alike are being forced to eat cats to survive, it appears that the death squads have a somewhat better diet at the expense of the rest of the population of the areas still under their control.

Evidence for this can be seen in the recently uploaded video that shows death squad members “capturing” a young boy for “smuggling” food into his neighborhood in Aleppo. NOTE: The translation of this video was provided by Syrian Perspective.

In the video, death squad members can be seen threatening and bullying the boy, who was merely attempting to sneak a few packs of chicken into his neighborhood. The boy can be heard saying “take them, take them” to the men surrounding him, obviously in fear for his life and hoping to surrender his food in exchange for it.

The fighters continue to mock the boy as he says, “We need food. What can we eat?” They respond to him by saying “You don’t need to eat.”

Such an exchange is interesting indeed since the suffering of the citizens in areas still controlled by the death squads is blamed on Assad by the Western media outlets and the death squads operating inside the country. After viewing this video, however, it should be understood that the death squads themselves are the responsible party for hindering the importation of food to starving citizens.

Indeed, even as far back as July, 2013, Reuters was forced to report that the death squads were implementing a blockade against supplies entering certain areas of Aleppo, resulting in thousands of hungry Syrians. The death squads, whom Reuters claims were aiming their blockade against the army, even hung signs in front of their checkpoint outside of Aleppo neighborhood Bustan al-Qasr which read, “”Food, medicine, oil, babies’ products, milk, vegetables, meat, bread: completely forbidden (from crossing).” Reuters fails to explain how “babies’ products” would be beneficial to the Syrian military and why these products necessitated a blockade.

In the end, the propaganda videos coming out of Syria and produced by the death squads are nothing more than just that – propaganda. Amidst the atrophy of the death squad forces as a result of the recent American pause of open and heavy funding and a series of political mistakes, as well as the growing victories of Assad’s forces, propaganda attempts are becoming more and more desperate.

Indeed, the propaganda narratives surrounding Syria on the part of the Anglo-Americans have always been absurd and there is no reason to expect any abrupt change of tactics.

Recently by Brandon Turbeville

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real ConspiraciesFive Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 275 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV.  He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.


Regional War Scenario. NATO-US-Turkey War Games Off the Syrian Coastline

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research
November 5, 2013

According to Turkish press reports, Turkey’s High Command will be hosting NATO’S Invitex military exercise in the Eastern Mediterranean in a clear act of provocation directed against Syria.

The Invitex-Eastern Mediterranean war games are scheduled from November 4 to 14.

Deafening silence. Not a single Western media has reported on these war games.

The official release by the TKS High Command suggests a war games scenario involving a regional war, under the assumption that the ongoing US-NATO-Israeli covert war on Syria could lead to military escalation. The countries considered to be a threat to Turkey and NATO are not mentioned.

According to the press dispatch of the Turkish Armed forces, various types of naval operations are envisaged. While the word “war” is not mentioned, the  stated objective consists in the “handling of a regional crisis”, presumably through military rather than diplomatic means. 

Turkish frigate F-245 TCG Oruç Reis

The focus is intended “to enhance co-operation and mutual training between participant countries.” Reading between the lines this suggests enhanced military coordination directed against potential enemy countries in the Middle East including Syria and Iran.

“NATO, the U.S. Navy and the Turkish Navy-Air Force-Coast Guard platforms will participate in the exercise, a statement from Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) said Nov. 4.”(Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey)

A significant deployment of both naval and air power is envisaged. According to the TKS communique, the participant units are:

NATO SNMG-2 (three frigates), U.S. Navy (one frigate), Turkish Navy (three frigates, two corvettes, four fast attack boats, three submarines, two oilers, two patrol boats, one landing ship, one tug boat, one maritime patrol aircraft, five helicopters, one amphibious team, one Naval WMD Destroy Team, (Multi National Maritime Security Center of Excellence), Turkish Coast Guard (three Coast Guard Boats) and Turkish Air Force aircrafts. (Ibid)

[READ THE FULL ARTICLE]


Obscuring the Details: A Panoramic Look at America’s Case Against Syria

by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
Global Research
October 13, 2013

Strategic Culture Foundation

The US federal government and the various agencies, media organizations, individuals, foreign governments, non-governmental organizations, lobbies, forces, and other entities that are tied to it have done everything in their power to obscure the details involving the chemical attacks that took place in Syria on August 21, 2013. The aim has been to justify the US-led foreign campaign that was launched against Syria in 2011 by making the Syrian government appear culpable of grievous crimes. The chemical attack on Ghouta has now come to represent the crux of the matter.

From the very start there was double-speaking coming from Washington and its cohorts about what happened in Ghouta. The Obama Administration and America’s allies deliberately ignored that chemical weapons were used in Syria prior to August 21, 2013. They have pretended that the United Nations investigation team that had arrived in Syria when chemical weapons were used in Ghouta had just stumbled there coincidentaly or with the purpose of «inspecting» the Syrian government’s chemical weapon depots.

Ignoring the Original Mandate of the UN Investigators 

In reality, the UN team that arrived in Syria in August was not a team of weapons inspectors. It was a team of «investigators.» Even more importantly, the Syrian government had invited the UN investigation team to Syria in March 2013. This was because the insurgents had launched chemical attacks on March 19, 2013. The US and its allies tried to blame Syria, but they were embarrassingly contradicted by Carla Del Ponte, one of the UN investigators responsible for Syria, that said all the evidence pointed to the insurgents and not the Syrian government. Although she backed her conclusion with facts, Del Ponte was dismissed by the US, and NATO even abnormally took the time to make a statement against here. Moreover, the insurgents were even caught trying to sneak sarin gas into Syria from Turkey by Turkish security forces in May 2013.

Because the insurgents were behind the chemical attacks in March 2013, Syria’s government originally wanted the UN investigators to have the authority and mandate to officially assign blame on which party used the chemical weapons. The US, however, put all types of obstacles in place to prevent the UN from issuing a report that the US-supported insurgents were using chemical weapons. It was the US, Britain, and France that prevented an UN investigation that could assign responsibility for any chemical weapon attacks from taking place. Instead they wanted a politicized inspection team that would try to demonize Syria and write reports against Damascus. This led to a deadlock in the United Nations over the type of team that the UN would send to work in Syria. A settlement was eventually reached. The US and its allies eventually reduced the mandate of the UN inspectors to one of only determining if chemical weapons were used.

The United Nation’s team even spells out the fact that they had originally entered Syria to investigate the March 2013 chemical attacks all in their September 2013 report’s Letter of Transmittal signed by Ake Sellstrom, the head of the UN mission, Scott Cairns, the head of the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) component of the UN mission, and Maurizio Barbeschi, the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) component of the UN mission. The UN team states the following on the report’s third page: «Having arrived in the Syrian Arab Republic on 18 August 2013, we were in Damascus on the 21 August preparing to conduct on-site inspections in connection with our investigation into the allegations concerning the use of chemical weapons in Khan al-Asal and in Sheik Maqsood and Saraqueb. Based on several reports of allegations on the use of chemical weapons in the Ghouta area of Damascus on 21 August 2013, you instructed us to focus our investigation efforts on the Ghouta allegations. We, therefore, proceeded to conduct on-site inspections in Moadamiyah in West Ghouta and Ein Tarma and Zamalka in East Ghouta».

Cooked US Intelligence and Implausible White House Stories

The narrative that the US government and its allies present about Ghouta is contradictory to logic and highly implausible. Added to the fact that the US has a track record of lying to create pretexts for aggression, Washington’s claims should be heavily scrutinized. So should the same group of non-governmental organizations that have consistently backed American wars and conjured instant reports to justify US foreign policy and war.

President Obama and John Kerry claimed that the Syrian military used chemical weapons while it was advancing militarily in Ghouta. This is contrary to any procedure that would be followed by an organized military force. An advancing military would not gas an area when it was entering it with its forces. Obama and Kerry might as well have claimed that the Syrian military had decided to reduce the number of its own troops by killing them.

Furthermore, there was no tactical need to use chemical weapons in Ghouta whatsoever. Ghouta did not have a large amount of anti-government fighters. Nor was Ghouta under the full control of the insurgents. Despite being in worse situations, the Syrian military never bothered using chemical weapons earlier in the conflict when things were dire for the Syrian government.

On the contrary, using chemical weapons would be a self-defeating and suicidal move by the Syrian government. Why would the Syrian government use chemical weapons when the combined UN team of OPCW and WHO investigators arrived in Syria to investigate the use of chemical attacks? Moreover, why would the Syrian military decide to use chemical weapons unnecessarily?

No evidence has been provided that the Syrian government was responsible for the chemical attack on Ghouta. On the contrary the US has only made claims and a series of contradictory statements. Using cooked Israeli evidence, Washington has claimed that the orders to use chemical weapons were intercepted, but has failed to provide the transcripts or to give any names of Syrian officials. In its own intelligence report the US government has also said that it knew in advance that the chemical attacks were going to happen. If the US government is to be believed, this would mean that the Obama Administration did not mention it and did nothing to prevent the use of chemical weapons from happening.

It turns out that the US government was given some type of advanced warning by the Iranian government about a chemical attack in Syria. The warning, however, was that the insurgents planned on using chemical weapons. This has been matched by statements from insurgents themselves that Saudi Arabia had provided the chemical weapons to the insurgents. Russian officials have also assessed that the chemical attacks in Ghouta were part of an intelligence operation conducted by Saudi Arabia.

[READ THE FULL ARTICLE]


VIDEO — Interview With The Syrian Electronic Army

Syrian Girl
October 3, 2013

Translated into english The first in person interview with the most powerful hacking organisation in the world


VIDEO — Massive blackout in Syria after rebels blast gas pipeline

RT
October 23, 2013

A gas pipeline was attacked near Damascus causing the capital and the southern part of Syria to suffer a blackout, SANA news agency reports. The electricity minister blamed the blast on rebels. READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/r3bt4d

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.


VIDEO — ‘Syria Blowback: EU turning blind eye to growing influence of radical Jihadists’

RT
October 22, 2013

The number of European Muslims joining the ranks of Islamist militants in Syria is growing every month. Now Norway has launched a hunt for two teenage sisters who have allegedly gone to the war-torn country to fight the regime alongside rebel forces.
For more on the dangers of European Muslims joining the Syrian Jihad, RT is joined by Middle East expert Mark Almond

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.


Suicide Bomber Kills 31 in Syria’s Hamah

Almanar News
October 20, 2013

Local Editor

Hamah BlastA suicide bomber blew up a truck laden with explosives at an army checkpoint in Syria’s central city of Hamah Sunday killing at least 31 people, a monitoring group said.

“At least 31 people, including regime troops, were killed when a man detonated a truck laden with explosives at a checkpoint near an agricultural vehicles company on the road linking Hamah to Salamiyeh,” the opposing UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

[READ THE FULL ARTICLE]

[h/t: FSA Crimes]

[related video: Deadly Impasse: Syrian army, rebels locked in battle over Damascus]