VIDEO — ‘Obama to attack Syria regardless how Congress votes’
RT
September 6, 2013
America’s envoy to the United Nations singled out Russia for criticism – for its outspoken opposition to strikes. And that’s as the UN chief himself ruled out a military solution to the Syrian crisis – warning that a strike would have tragic consequences and fuel sectarian violence in the region. Investigative journalist Charlie McGrath has commented on the US envoy’s statements – saying international trust in Washington’s words has all but eroded.
FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES on Syria ‘chemical weapons’ crisis: http://on.rt.com/0yh5ju
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air
Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT
RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.
Amash: Lawmakers Who Vote for Syria Attack “Might as Well Start Cleaning Out Their Office”
Activist Post
September 6, 2013
Read more at http://www.activistpost.com/2013/09/amash-lawmakers-who-vote-for-syria.html#cg7ZA9jH7W38mdcW.99
If you’re voting yes on military action in #Syria, might as well start cleaning out your office. Unprecedented level of public opposition.
— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) September 5, 2013
On #Syria vote, sound public policy (no war) is firmly aligned w/incredibly lopsided & intense public will. Voting yes would be devastating.
— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) September 5, 2013
…Ds & Rs came together to fight #NSA overreach. Americans are now counting on us to speak for them on #Syria. We’ll stop this together.
— Justin Amash (@repjustinamash) September 6, 2013
Read more on Syria Here
VIDEO — Terror App: Warning system for Syria spillover introduced to Lebanese phones
RT
September 4, 2013
An SOS button in your pocket. Smartphone developers in Lebanon have launched their own early warning system for mobile devices – software that allows users to instantly map terror bombing sites and report crimes or suspicious behaviour. RT’s Paula Slier reports from Beirut. READ MORE http://on.rt.com/gz3xui
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air
Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT
RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.
MUST SEE — Sen Graham Warns of Nuke Strike After Missing Warheads Report
CounterPsyOps
September 6, 2013
Senator Lindsay Graham has warned South Carolinians about the threat of a ‘terrorist nuclear attack’ on the same day that our exclusive high level military intel revealed to us that nuclear warheads were being shipped to South Carolina from a major Texas airforce base under an ‘off the record’ black ops transfer.
By Alex Jones & Anthony Gucciardi, Infowars.com
Found in the CBS report entitled ‘Graham: Nukes In Hands Of Terrorists Could Result In Bomb Coming To Charleston Harbor’, the report details Graham’s warning that a lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear ‘bombing’ in Charleston, South Carolina — the very destination of the black ops nuclear transfer. The CBS report reads:
“He [Graham] says if there is no U.S. response [to Syria], Iran will not believe America’s resolve to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Graham also says those nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists could result in a bomb coming to Charleston Harbor.”
Graham is quite literally saying that if we do not launch a war with Syria, South Carolina may be nuked. And this ultimately reeks of yet another false flag being orchestrated by the United States government in order to send us into war, or at the very least a threat. Except this time, we’re talking about nuclear weapons. Amazingly, we were the first to get intel on this from our credible and extremely high level military source, who told us the following:
“Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up will take them from there.”
This was sent to us before the Graham report came out warning about the nuclear attack on South Carolina, and coincides exactly with what Graham is saying. I am deeply concerned by these findings, and ask everyone to spread the word on this information immediately. Whether or not Graham is receiving intel from higher ups and believes in a legitimate terror attack on the horizon is unknown, but the reality here is that we have intelligence that has linked the unsigned transfer of nuclear warheads to this exact location.
Here is the video report we did on Tuesday regarding the missing nuclear warheads:
Now, we need answers.
The entire event is eerily similar to the unsigned nuke transfer that is now known as the ’2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident’, in which nuclear warheads went ‘missing’ from Minot Air Force Base and Barksdale Air Force Base back in August of 2007. The Minot event, however, was major national news and was even covered by the mainstream media extensively. Disturbingly, however, numerous individuals from the base began dying like flies and committing suicide after the event — and that’s even when it was in the mainstream.
Hopefully, this entire thing will amount to nothing and pass by without any form of ‘terror’ attack. Hopefully the attendee during the speech who told the US News publication that Graham’s speech was ‘absolute fear mongering’ is right. Unfortunately, the military source revealing this information is extremely accurate and is absolutely certain that a black ops nuclear transfer did indeed take place. And what’s more concerning is the fact that we have not heard from the source in quite some time.
We are risking our lives bringing you this report on the high level intel and connecting the dots here to what Lindsay is saying. You won’t hear about this in the mega media unless we force them to cover it, and it’s up to us to get this out there. For the first time, we may be able to utilize this high level intelligence to get answers and stop a potential attack.
[related Potent News video: WW3/Syria-war Predictive Programming in 2006 film “Southland Tales”??? (nuclear strike on Texas shown in this fiction film excerpt).]
VIDEO — WW3/Syria-war Predictive Programming in 2006 film “Southland Tales”???
by Amir Alwani
PotentNews.com
September 6, 2013
I saw “Southland Tales” back in 2008 and it’s been lingering around in my mind ever since. It smells like predictive programming to me. I’m not saying it definitely is predictive programming. I put a question mark up in the title because I’m not sure. It sure smells like it, though. It was released in 2006 and a lot of this clip seems pertinent today.
To be clear, I know the US has not dropped bombs on Syria yet, but the way things seem to be moving now this could be a reality soon and what is interesting is that this film from 2006 features a clip where we see that the US is at war with Iraq, Iran, Syria, North Korea and Afghanistan. Blocking of the strait of Hormuz is also mentioned in this clip as well as “patriot act expansion” which would definitely describe the NDAA quite well. Many observers have also noted that it is not far fetched to imagine that there is a chance that the powers-that-be could stage a false-flag nuclear attack on the US or Europe (or could foment tensions to the point that things simply escalate that much), and this film indeed begins with a nuclear attack on US soil.
related link:
- VIDEO — Justin Timberlake wears Bloody Baphomet and More! Illuminati Hidden Symbols in ‘Southland Tales’ Movie.
- MUST SEE — Sen Graham Warns of Nuke Strike After Missing Warheads Report
Amir Alwani is a musician and the founding editor of PotentNews.com. Feel free to donate dollars or bitcoins to support his work.
VIDEO — Chemical Attack on Syria – Who Did It And Why
Syrian Girl
September 5, 2013
This is a run down on the chronology and all the evidence leading up to and after the chemical weapons attack in Damascus.
US and Allied Warships off the Syrian Coastline: Naval Deployment Was Decided “Before” the August 21 Chemical Weapons Attack
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research
September 2, 2013
A massive US and allied naval deployment is occurring in the Eastern Mediterranean off Syria’s coastline as well as in the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.
While this display of military might may not be part of an immediate attack plan on Syria, it is creating an atmosphere of fear and panic within Syria.
The US Navy has deployed the USS San Antonio, an amphibious transport ship to the Eastern Mediterranean. The San Antonio is joining five US destroyers which “are already in place for possible missile strikes on Syria, a defense official said Sunday.”
The USS San Antonio, with several helicopters and hundreds of Marines on board, is “on station in the Eastern Mediterranean” but “has received no specific tasking,” said the defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. US Navy deploys five warships, one amphibious ship to Mediterranean for Syria
While the USS San Antonio has amphibious landing equipment, which can be used to land some six thousand sailors and marines, “no boots on the ground”, however, remains the official motto.
So why then has the US deployed its most advanced amphibious landing ship? The reports suggest that this is routine and there are no attack plans:
“No amphibious landing is in the works, however, as President Barack Obama has ruled out any “boots on the ground” (Ibid)
USS San Antonio
There are currently five destroyers off the coast of Syria: the USS Stout, Mahan, Ramage, Barry and Graveley, not to mention the San Antonio amphibious landing vessel.
The destroyers are equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles which “are ready to fire … if Obama gives the order.”
On 28 August the U.S. Navy announced the deployment of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Stout en route to join four other destroyers “amid allegations that the regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against civilians on August 21″.
In a not unusual twist, this deployment of US and allied naval forces preceded the chemical weapons attack which is being blamed on president Bashar al Assad.
According to Naval records, the guided missile destroyer USS Stout (DDG 55) departed Naval Station Norfolk, Va. on August 18, 2013, “for deployment to the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility” (see image below upon its departure in Norfolk on August 18).
The USS Ramage destroyer left Naval Station Norfolk on August 13 for the Eastern Mediterranean, “to relieve the Mahan”.
Yet in fact what was decided was to deploy all five destroyers along the Syrian coastline. This decision was taken by the Pentagon well in advance of the chemical attacks of August 21, which constitute Obama’s pretext to intervene on humanitarian grounds.
PN 