HIGHLY POTENT NEWS THAT MIGHT CHANGE YOUR VIEWS

UK

Former Child Actor Is Let Down After Opening Up to Media: ‘I named names, but they’ve buried my story’

by Patrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire
October 21, 2012

Has Rupert Murdoch’s Times Newspaper also joined the BBC’s practice of covering for child abusers in high places?

On Friday Oct 11, former child actor and now investigative journalist, Ben Fellows, published his own sordid account of his personal experiences growing up in show business and working at the BBC. The following week, his story was picked-up by the London newspaper Daily Express on Oct 17th.

Ben Fellows on the BBC’s News 24in 2006.

What the public is not aware of however, is that the Murdoch-owned Times newspaper in London had also summoned Fellows to an interview regarding his story the following day on Thursday Oct 18th.

“Since the original story I wrote, a lot of readers, people and other members of the media have been asking me to name names, and actually accusing me of feeding the abuse system by not naming names in my initial story. So when the Times contacted me, it seemed like the ideal opportunity to names names.”

Fellows continues, “It’s all rather easy to pin the entire scandal on a deceased, former celebrity like Jimmy Savile, but if you’re going to name the names of currently active entertainment professionals and politicians, you have to go with the biggest and strongest media outlet because you will get sued and the Times told me, ‘You have nothing to worry about, we have the most powerful lawyers in the world’ – and that gave me the confidence to name names”.

According to Fellows, he was interviewed by Jack Malvern, a veteran and senior writer with the Times at the Novotel in Greenwich last Thursday, with the promise that his story would go out in the Saturday morning edition of the Times, but when Saturday arrived, no story appeared – and thus, no names were named.

“The fact they haven’t run my story worries me, because they asked me to talk and I did – and now I’m not sure which way to turn”, explains Fellows.

“It made me feel like I had been ‘debriefed’ and not interviewed, and that maybe the only reason I was summoned there was to give information to them (the Murdoch press) for their own internal use.”

The irony of this situation is too much to ignore, as the Murdoch empire’s flagship ‘anti-paedophile’ newspaper, The Sun, is pulling no punches with the BBC over their Jimmy Savile cover-up, since the BBC has been exposed for moth-balling two internal investigations over child abuse within their state-funded media realm.

In the case of Fellows, he appears to have hand-delivered a number of top show business and political personality names to the Times, names whom he has witnessed first-hand to be involved with a wide range of highly inappropriate and illegal activities – including predatory advances on a child actor (Fellows), offering and consuming of Class A narcotics, and the promise of success by top producers in exchange for sex. He maintains that some of the names the Times is holding include a few of the most powerful individuals in the entertainment industry.

Fellows believed that the reason the Times has killed the story is because one of the names he gave was a celebrity who SKY TV has a heavy amount invested in for the coming season.

“They wanted me to name names, but not the ones I gave them!” said Fellows.

“I had no idea that this person was to be the star of SKY this coming season when I named them in my Times interview. Now they are sitting on the whole story because it conflicts with their organisation’s plans this year. The hypocrisy is clear to see, and very disappointing to say the least.”

“What the Times is doing here, is no different than how the BBC is covering for itself. And the end result of both cover-ups is that the public have less knowledge of child abuse in the system. I think our major media outlets are failing the public, and I now it’s there for everyone to see.”

So now the Times has joined the BBC in covering-up reported activities of people in positions of power and influence, in their own self-interest.

“I was offered an ‘Exclusive’, but I did not respond to this because it sounded like code for ‘money’, but I fully expected to run this story with so many high profile people mentions”, said Fellows.

Tonight’s episode of Panorama on BBC is nothing more than a late move to try and repair what is clearly a broken and corrupt media giant.

Similarly, Tuesday’s appearance at a House Select Committee by George Entwistle, current Director General of the BBC, is unlikely to yield much, as Entwistle, then Director of Programming at the BBC, was also the man who allegedly pulled the BBC’s ‘Newsnight’ investigation last Dec 2011.

Fellows adds here, “I am concerned that when it’s all said and done, the BBC and the government are just going to have Jimmy Savile ‘done and dusted’ and maybe pin some conviction on an old employee, then close the book on what is clearly an institutional and social disease which has infected the BBC and other corridors of power in Britain”.

How long will the Times sit on this story, and if they do run it, will they name the names that Fellows delivered to them?

Considering the weight of allegations from the Savile Affair, we all can agree that it’s in a free society’s best interest for any major newspaper to print a story which deals with the protection of children – which is certainly, at least in our opinion – in the public’s interest.

….


British Democracy: Living in Fear, Kept in the Dark

by Colin Todhunter
Global Research
October 17, 2012

Earlier this year, I watched the BBC’s main political debate programme that allows an audience of members of the public to put questions to a panel of politicians and so-called experts. Syria was on the agenda. A member of the panel referred to the Syrian rebels as ‘freedom fighters’. Within a few minutes, all panel members and the audience were using this term to refer to the rebels. It led me to ponder why so many people were willing to accept at face value an agenda that portrayed the insurgents in such a wholly positive light.

It also led me to conclude just how easy it is to manipulate ordinary people into backing imperialist ventures abroad, which are fought on behalf of rich interests. At a time of biting austerity and attacks on workers and the welfare state, well over a billion pounds of ordinary people’s money was used to fund the illegal bombing of Libya.

The justification sold to people for such militarism is that dictators are bad. The justification sold to people for attacking or destabilising countries resulting in mass death is that democracy must therefore be forced through by the barrel of a gun. Isn’t it terrible, the politicians and media say, that Assad is a brutal dictator who is preventing democracy by putting down the rebels.

The Assad regime undoubtedly has its faults, but nothing is ever said by the corporate media about the authoritarian ruling clique in Saudi Arabia, which has even given its name to that country (House of Saud). Nothing is ever said about a western backed dictator in Bahrain who has been in power for 52 years. Nothing is ever revealed about the brutal ongoing crackdowns on protestors and dissenters in those countries. When Bahrain used Saudi troops to put down uprisings in 2011, the resultant death toll was proportionally much larger than was the loss of life in Egypt during the uprising there. In fact, if the death toll in Bahrain were taken as a proportion of the population, the equivalent death toll for Egypt would have been 12,000.

Where was the outrage from the US and its client states? That’s right, there was none. The King of Bahrain was even invited to attend Queen Elizabeth’s Jubilee celebrations atBuckinghamPalace.

As it did inLibya, repressive Saudi Arabia is playing a big role in facilitating the rag-tag rebels in Syria to destabilise a sovereign state that stands in the way of NATO and Israeli interests.

And far away, back inBritain, the public is being fed a pack of lies by politicians and the mainstream media about the situation in Syria, just as it has been over other military adventures over the past decade. The majority of Brits don’t have much of a clue about what is happening. They are unaware that Syria forms part of the greater game in the region. They fail to see the links between Syria, Pakistan, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran, which are all part of a Washington-led wider geo-political strategy hell-bent on global domination, controlling the world’s mineral resources, pipeline routes and lining the pockets of western financiers and oil, armaments and logistics companies. Too many remain confused or ignorant thanks to duplicitous politicians and the corporate media.

The public cannot know the reality. They will not be allowed to know. They must be kept in fear and in the dark and deceived by politicians and the media that churn out increasingly tired-sounding clichés about a war on terror or humanitarian militarism to justify murderous brutality.

And the result is that too many people accept the lie that rag-tag forces made up of vicious, faction-ridden fighters, illegally armed by NATO terror governments and unelected regimes in Saudi and Qatar, are fighting for freedom and democracy. Those forces and nations wouldn’t know about freedom and democracy if they fell over it.

Sorry, my mistake, they would and they do. That’s why they seek to crush it when it appears. And that applies whether it appears within the borders of the US, Britain or Saudi, or elsewhere in places that are of strategic importance to them. The US track record of crushing democratic governments is well documented by the likes of Noam Chomsky and historian William Blum. And look no further to see the attacks on WikiLeaks or the Occupy Movement to see how democratic movements are treated at home. Look no further to see how democratic workers’ movements that took hundreds of years to build in Britain and elsewhere in Europe are under sustained attack.

Giving the people the opportunity to vote every four or five years, while in the meantime deceiving, misinforming and lying to them, has no more to do with democracy or freedom than what is happening in Syria right now.

If more ordinary folk were turn their attention away from glossy sports events, premiership football, cheap knockabout BBC political debate shows or all other forms of comatosing infortainment for one minute, they might well realise that the billionaire criminal elites that take their taxes and dictate national and foreign policy are in many cases a good deal worse than any number of the regimes they seek to demonise.

Articles by: Colin Todhunter

Related content:

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

http://www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: media@globalresearch.ca


Sir Jim’ll Fix It Alright! As Honourable Paedophile and Provider in the Corridors of Power

by Peter Sterry
21st Century Wire
Senior Researcher
October 15, 2012

The current wave of shock and disgust at the discovery that Jimmy Savile was a systematic sexual predator should not be confined to the disgraced former television presenter. 

With every passing day it seems, more evidence emerges of  Savile’s repulsive activities at Stoke Mandeville, Broadmoor and various other hospitals and morgues around the country, as well as, of course – at the old BBC Television Centre.

As each new story comes out, it becomes more and more evident that there certainly was knowledge at the highest levels of media and entertainment of Savile’s deeds. Even Piers Morgan laughed-off potential warnings of Savile’s under-aged habits while editor of the Sun’s Bizarre Column in the early 90′s.

Much worse than his own sordid habits, however, is that penchant for young children was not an isolated phenomenon. The deceased disc jockey was also a regular visitor to the notorious Haut La Garenne Childrens’ Home in Jersey, but much less well-known, is that Savile wasn’t always acting  solely for himself.

Jimmy, ever the Fixer, was a regular at the notorious Haut La Garenne Children’s Home in the 1970s.

Solicitor Allan Collins represents 42 people who were abused in Jersey care homes such as Haut de la Garenne and says a number of his clients have named Savile in investigations.

Collins says, “The memories are there, they are very vivid, as regards to allegations of abuse, they certainly came up at the beginning of the case four to five years ago but were very difficult to interpret because we were talking about Jimmy Savile.”

Why the fact that the allegations were about Jimmy Savile made then extra difficult “to interpret” Collins doesn’t explain. He went on to add here, “It is very difficult to judge and it is just a great shame that people now talking to the media hadn’t come forward four or five years ago as it may have made it easier to get to the truth of the allegations.”

The Daily Express also reported that Savile kept a “special room” where he took young girls after appearing at the Empire Ballroom in Leeds during the late 1950s.

According to one woman’s account:

“I was 14 and remember my older sister telling me that I must not go near the stage door because Savile and another star kept a ‘special room’ where they took young girls”.

“I’d wanted to get his autograph until then. I was terrified.”

[READ MORE…]


British Troops Join US Forces on the Jordan-Syria Border

CounterPsyOps
October 14, 2012

GlobalResearch.ca

According to ANSA, the Italian News Agency, “several hundred British soldiers and military advisors are in Jordan to monitor the Syria situation, Western diplomatic sources said on Thursday.”

One hundred US troops are already stationed on the Syria-Jordan border. They were deployed on the orders of the US president and commander in chief without seeking the approval of the US Congress.

Sources do not indicate the composition of these US and British troops, as to whether they are regular troops or in large part special forces.

The New York Times confirms the presence of 150 British troops,: The Times of London reported “on an undisclosed number of British troops. The troops have been in Jordan since participating in joint military maneuvers in the past months. They remained on concerns over Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal, Jordanian military sources said, adding that French troops might also be in place. ANSA, the Italian News Agency, October 11, 2012, emphasis added)

[hat tip: Friends of Syria]


Google Account as Official Virtual ID!? Yikes! [video]

The Truther Girls
October 11, 2012

The UK government is working on a new system that would allow you to use your social media and other accounts as official virtual ID for accessing government services. Am I the only one who find this scary?!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/national-virtual-id-card-scheme…

India’s Universal Biometric ID program:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18141584
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18156858

UN E-Government Readiness Program- survey 2012
http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf


London Calling: American World Domination [video]

Adam VS The Man
October 10, 2012

Michael Bloom

To hear the full podcast: http://adamvstheman.com/podcast
Please address hate mail to adam@adamvstheman.com
Donate Bitcoin: 1BWeuWdgjrP8PFAwBwgwU9BUqJNewScouy
Invest here to support ADAM VS THE MAN!
http://adamvstheman.com/invest


Is UK Deporting British Intel Informants to US – Patrick Henningsen [video]

108morris108
October 6, 2012

In this Gauntanamo age, Britain is deporting British citizens and residents to the USA. All part of the war on Islam/terror.
Some of these people have already been behind bars for years without due process.
Some of them have mirky pasts which involved British Intel. Patrick Explains in his article here: http://21stcenturywire.com/2012/10/06/babar-ahmad-extradition-rip-british-jus…
Here is an article from the Guardian explaining what awaits them:
http://www.stopwar.org.uk/index.php/usa-war-on-terror/1931-read-this-and-know…
Read this and know why the decision to extradite Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan is an outrage
05 October 2012 Sadhbh Walshe USA and the War on Terror
The conditions to be imposed on Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan, who have not yet been tried or convicted of anything, throws the concept of being innocent until proven guilty out the window.

The Guardian
5 October 2012
Babar Ahmad
LAST WEEK, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) refused to accept the appeal of their ruling allowing for the extradition of Babar Ahmad and four others to the United States.
This decision, from a court whose very purpose is to ensure human rights are upheld, has been widely condemned by human rights groups and advocates, who are convinced the decision will do just the opposite.
The appeal was largely based on the fact that if the men are extradited to the US, they will face years of torturous solitary confinement in America’s notorious maximum security prisons.
There is another disturbing aspect of the ruling, however, that is less discussed, but equally worrisome: that these men’s chances of getting a fair trial will also be compromised by the pre-trial conditions in which they are likely to be held.
Because Ahmad and the others fall under the category of terror suspects, there is a strong likelihood that if their extradition proceeds, they will be held in pre-trial detention facilities with special administrative measures (Sams) in place.
Sams were established by the federal government in 1996 to deal with certain gang leaders who had demonstrated substantial risk that their “communication or contact with persons could result in the death or serious bodily injury to persons.” Since 9/11, the need for an inmate to have “demonstrated” their reach was relaxed, and the department of justice began to use Sams, pre-trial, for terrorism suspects.
So what this means for pre-trial defendants is that they are not only held in the kind of extreme isolation that is routine in facilities like ADX Florence — the federal super-max prison where inmates spend 22 to 23 hours per day in a completely sealed and soundproof cell, and maybe an hour or so in an outdoor cage for solitary exercise — but they are also subjected to extra measures of isolation. This ensures both that they completely cut off from the outside world and that the outside world is cut off from them.
A defendant placed under Sams is usually only allowed to communicate with his immediate family (parents, siblings, spouse and children) and his attorney.
Letters to and from his approved family members can take up to six months to be cleared. Such prisoners cannot write to or receive visits from anyone else: friends, extended family or supporters; and they can have absolutely no contact with the media. In addition to the gag that is placed on these defendants, the small number of people with whom they are allowed to have contact are also gagged, as they, too, are bound to abide by the Sams.
So, for instance, an attorney who goes to see her client in solitary somewhere like ADX Florence may notice that her client is deteriorating under the conditions of his confinement. But she cannot discuss those conditions with anyone — not the media, not even the prisoner’s family.
…………………………………….

There’s another, even more chilling reason for lawyers to be concerned about defending clients placed under Sams. Attorneys risk prosecution if they violate any of the terms of the Sams, and precedent has it that the sanction for any violations will be much more severe than the proverbial slap on the wrist. This past June, a ten-year prison sentence was upheld in federal court for Lynne Stewart, a 73-year-old attorney who was convicted in 2005 of “providing aid to terrorism” for sharing statements from her client, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, with the media.
The prosecution originally sought a 30-year sentence. Stewart, who has been treated for breast cancer, fears she will die in prison.
Read the rest on the link above (Youtube description limit reached)