HIGHLY POTENT NEWS THAT MIGHT CHANGE YOUR VIEWS

US

VIDEO — Violent May Day: Police fire flash bangs, pepper spray at protesters in Seattle

Russia Today
May 2, 2013

Video courtesy: http://www.youtube.com/user/seacams

Violent clashes marked the final hours of May Day protests in Seattle, as police officers fired pepper spray and launched ‘flash bang’ grenades into crowds, leading to two local reporters being pepper-sprayed and 17 arrests – READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/9o3z2v

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first new


Journalism schools start teaching students to fly drones

End the Lie – Independent News
March 22, 2013

A small drone is seen during a hearing of the US Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, March 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowski)

A small drone is seen during a hearing of the US Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, March 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowski)

Next generation’s Walter Cronkites won’t be learning the traditional tricks and tips used by the journalists of today. Drones could be the next big tool for newsgathering, and some journalism students are getting hands-on experience already.

Editor’s note: be sure to check out our latest article on this trend as well as an article on drone use for news-gathering from 2012.

Drones aren’t likely to be approved for commercial use for a few more years, but in the meantime hobbyists are free to purchase and assemble small unmanned aerial vehicles that can hoover close to the earth and offer literally a bird’s eye view of the ground. One police department in Colorado has already logged close to 200 hours with their search-and-rescue drones, and the Department of Homeland Security has its own personal fleet for border patrol. But as America enters the dawn of the drone age, will law enforcement agencies be the only ones benefiting from unmanned aerial vehicles?

“In 2015, when the FAA is set to begin to relax its prohibition on use and integrate civilian use of drones, then I would think the first folks in the door would be media because there’s such an obvious use,” Ryan Calo, a law professor at the University of Washington, testified during a Senate hearing earlier this week. Congress is currently trying to put together guidelines for a domestic drone program that will be ready for the big UAV boom expected in just a matter of months, but commercial services and police department won’t be the only ones that will benefit. As Calo explained to Congress, using a drone to gather news is an option not often considered.

Some would beg to differ. Take Bill Allen, for example. Allen, a science and journalism professor at the University of Missouri, is already making his j-school students use remote controlled drones to help discover what they could do to the industry.

“We have a class here of journalism students who are learning to fly J-bots, for journalism robots, or drones,” Allen told ABC News. “So they learn to fly them, and also do what reporters do: brainstorm ideas, go out and do reporting, do drone based photography and video. We’re trying to see if this is going to be useful for journalism.”

By giving journalists controls over small light-weighted drones, reporters are allowed to have another set of eyes that can scour hard-to-get-to-places where a hit story might otherwise be unobtainable. One scenario described by the university’s radio station content director to ABC exemplified exactly what a drone could do in the hands of the right reporter:

“Scott Pham, director of content at the University of Missouri’s public radio station KBIA, described the story of a drone hobbyist flying a camera-equipped helicopter over a field in Texas near his home capturing images. When the man looked at the images later, he noticed a creek he had never seen before that was flushed red. When he looked into it, he discovered a meat processing plant that was illegally dumping into the creek”

“That’s news gathering that can happen in your backyard,” Pham added to ABC. “That’s where the real value is. From my perspective that’s what actually expands journalism. Tools that allow us to get new information and report it, and that’s what I think a drone can do.”

Matthew Dickinson, a system administrator and instructor for the Information Technology Program in the MU Computer Science Department, explains to the school’s engineering department that drones are indeed providing students with a powerful tool unmatched in their industry this side of a costly chopper.

“It’s giving the journalism people the chance to get what they could get with a helicopter at one-one thousandth of the price,” Dickinson tells the department’s Marie French.

What so-called “j-drones” also do, though, is enough to raise a few worries. National discussion on domestic drones has already focused significantly on the potential privacy violations that could exist if the government is given the go-ahead to use small surveillance UAVs to spy on suspects. Privacy advocates call the likely onslaught of drones an Orwellian nightmare that would render the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution almost nonexistent. Such is the reason for congressional committees to investigate the matters now before privacy is pulverized forever.

“Rules are necessary to ensure that fundamental standards for fairness, privacy and accountability are understood,” Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) Director Amie Stepanovich testified before the Senate earlier this week. Even Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California), who has openly advocated for drone use in the past, seemed unsure at the hearing of what the right thing to do would be to protect Americans from all-watching aircraft.

“What altitude can they fly? What kind of facial recognition are they capable of at various activities? Can they take pictures of individuals through windows of their home?” Feinstein asked. “Drones are hard to spot for the untrained eye, so your ability to protect yourself is not great.”

But as Congress and the Federal Aviation Administration accelerate their studies on what drones should and shouldn’t do, hobbyists, educators and students can still operate small aircraft — some as inexpensive as only $300 — to play with what could be the next generation of journalist’s most must-have tool. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s has already joined Missouri by adding a Drone Journalism course of its own that is teaching other college students not to necessarily be scared of flying, robot devices that can stream images anywhere on Earth.

“Drones tend to have a negative connotation in today’s media,” University of Nebraska student Robert Partyka told Fast Company. “The public mostly hears the word drone when associated with war and destruction. However, drone technology can be used in many other aspects, including field reporting. Part of this project’s goal is to discover how best to utilize this technology in the field of journalism.”

Source: RT


VIDEO — Eyewitness: ‘Tamerlan run over by police vehicle and then shot’

21stCenturyWire
April 27, 2013

NEW EVIDENCE: Now an additional piece of eyewitness evidence has surfaced from a radio broadcast which aired on Friday April 19, 2013 on WEEI 93.7 FM in Boston, where a caller named Linda explains how the shootout transpired on Dexter Street in Watertown during the early morning hours. She is saying that she saw the first suspect, Tamerlan, mortally wounded and then run over by police, after which time the police began their incredible manhunt for the second suspect Dzhokhar. Why would police change their story about Tamerlan? Listen. and you decide…

http://www.21stcenturywire.com/2013/0…

If you have any information relating to this audio clip please get in touch with us.

THIS VIDEO MONTAGE IS PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION PURPOSES AND IS EXHIBITED HERE NOT FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES AND UNDER U.S. FAIR USE POLICY AND IS INTENDED TO STIMULATE FURTHER DEBATE AND DISCUSSION ON THIS IMPORTANT SUBJECT.


VIDEO — ‘Why did they need to kill my son?’ – Tsarnaev’s mother

Russia Today
April 25, 2013

he mother of the two Boston Marathon bombing suspects claims she has seen video which proves her son Tamerlan was still alive after he was detained. Police had earlier said the eldest brother was run over by his younger sibling, who was making his getaway. RT’s Tom Barton told us more about what was said by both brother’s parents at a press-conference in Dagestan.

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 500 million YouTube views benchmark.


Man Denied Life-Saving Liver Transplant Due to Medical Marijuana Usage

Pic: Hupu2 (CC)

disinformation
April 28, 2013

Sick people being condemned to a painful, lingering death due to using a medicinal plant that doesn’t have the blessing of Big Pharma? It’s the American Way!

Via Alternet:

After being diagnosed with liver cancer in 2009, Norman B. Smith applied to the liver transplant list at Cedar-Sinai hospital. While waiting for a transplant, Mr. Smith underwent chemotherapy in an attempt to destroy the cancer eating away at his liver. This caused severe side-effects, common to many cancer patients. In an attempt to curb the pain, and on the recommendation of his oncologist, Mr. Smith began using medical marijuana. Cannabis has become increasingly common as a medicine of choice for patients undergoing chemotherapy, since it increases appetite and reduces pain—minimizing the chance of a patient developing cancer related wasting syndrome. Finally, in September of 2010, Mr. Smith was notified that he was eligible for a liver transplant and was placed on the liver transplant list. Mr. Smith continued his treatment and submitted to drug testing per the hospital’s transplant list policy. After testing positive for THC (one of the active chemicals in marijuana), Mr. Smith was taken off the transplant list and denied a life saving procedure.

Keep reading.

Sick people being condemned to a painful, lingering death due to using a medicinal plant that doesn’t have the blessing of Big Pharma? It’s the American Way!

Via Alternet:

After being diagnosed with liver cancer in 2009, Norman B. Smith applied to the liver transplant list at Cedar-Sinai hospital. While waiting for a transplant, Mr. Smith underwent chemotherapy in an attempt to destroy the cancer eating away at his liver. This caused severe side-effects, common to many cancer patients. In an attempt to curb the pain, and on the recommendation of his oncologist, Mr. Smith began using medical marijuana. Cannabis has become increasingly common as a medicine of choice for patients undergoing chemotherapy, since it increases appetite and reduces pain—minimizing the chance of a patient developing cancer related wasting syndrome. Finally, in September of 2010, Mr. Smith was notified that he was eligible for a liver transplant and was placed on the liver transplant list. Mr. Smith continued his treatment and submitted to drug testing per the hospital’s transplant list policy. After testing positive for THC (one of the active chemicals in marijuana), Mr. Smith was taken off the transplant list and denied a life saving procedure.

Keep reading.

– See more at: http://disinfo.com/2013/04/man-denied-life-saving-liver-transplant-due-to-medical-marijuana-usage/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+disinfo%2FoMPh+%28Disinformation%29#sthash.8CI2us1G.dpuf


Boston Bombing Stage: An ensemble cast of soldiers, spooks and ‘cleaners’

21stCenturyWire
April 22, 2013

RELATED STORY: Actors, Directors and Bloody Squibs: Was the Boston Bombing Pure Hollywood?

21st Century Wire


1-Boston-BombingTurn down the volume and look at the pictures…

As soon as US federal agencies, led by the FBI took over the Boston Bombing case, officials were adamant that the public ignore all of the photos publicly available – photos which authorities themselves solicited from citizens in the wake of the disaster.

In the end, all the authorities want the public to focus their point of attention on is the FBI’s images of their prime suspects… the Tsaranev brothers… “from Chechnya”.

‘Case closed, now move along’.

Our photo diagram (below) shows the almost unbelievable theatre, including an ensemble collection of character on site – and we’re not talking about genuine victims, police and EMS workers. No, we’re talking about the alarming array of on-site ‘actors’ – mercenary soldiers (some wearing Craft International gear), conspicuous spooks, non-injured victims, and cleaners.

The refusal of the FBI and law enforcement to address any of these suspicious characters and embarrassing anomalies during their series of press conferences last week, indicates that there may be an intention to either avoid, or worse… to cover-up some aspects of the Boston Bombing, due to either political, or internal agency classified operational security issues and other such ‘events’.

We are told not to ask any more questions about who carried out the Boston Bombings because the FBI have “found their men”, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. We can begin by asking questions about some of the character walking through the bomb scene, many with their hands in their pockets. Take a close look…

The Boston Stage
PHOTO DIAGRAM: Crime scene image entitled, “The Boston Stage”, courtesy of Jason Liosatos – for 21st Century Wire.

Keep asking questions. Spread the information.

Demand answers to unanswered questions.

Actors, Directors and Bloody Squibs: Was the Boston Bombing Pure Hollywood?

21st Century Wire asks… Was any of it staged for effect?Now we can’t say one way or the other, whether some aspects of – or if the whole of the Boston Bombing ‘event’ was staged.

Many people’s first reaction to scenes of the bombing were that of disbelief – it was gruesome like no one had ever seen before – not even from war photos. Truly horrific and shocking. So much pain and suffering of so many victims.

Still, there are skeptics, but as not much towards what happened as such (most people take the bombing itself on face value), but rather, how perfectly it was was captured on film and in picture, from the stunning colorful plume cloud explosion which shot perfectly into the street – almost like a Hollywood film, or the ripped and torn cloths of victims, and the bright red colored spatters of blood on the pavement, or like the icon images of victims with legs and fingers blown off, being rushed away in wheel chairs where they would be photographed perfectly…

Read more and find out how… 


TIME-LAPSE VIDEO — Boston Bombing Finish Line

YouTube — Mike Wayne
April 19, 2013

slowed to 2x real time

real time: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OARp4f…