Aspartame in Milk Without a Label? Big Dairy Petitions FDA For Approval
Activist Post
February 23, 2013
Two powerful dairy organizations, The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), are petitioning the Food and Drug Administration to allow aspartame and other artificial sweeteners to be added milk and other dairy products without a label.
The FDA currently allows the dairy industry to use “nutritive sweeteners” including sugar and high fructose corn syrup in many of their products. Nutritive sweeteners are defined as sweeteners with calories.
This petition officially seeks to amend the standard of identification for milk, cream, and 17 other dairy products like yogurt, sweetened condensed milk, sour cream, and others to provide for the use of any “safe and suitable sweetener” on the market.
They claim that aspartame and other artificial sweeteners would promote healthy eating and is good for school children.
According to the FDA notice issued this week:
IDFA and NMPF state that the proposed amendments would promote more healthful eating practices and reduce childhood obesity by providing for lower-calorie flavored milk products. They state that lower-calorie flavored milk would particularly benefit school children who, according to IDFA and NMPF, are more inclined to drink flavored milk than unflavored milk at school.
Although the FDA considers aspartame to be a “safe and suitable” sweetener, a recent Yale University study appears to directly challenge the claim that aspartame would reduce obesity. In fact, the study concluded just the opposite, that artificial sweeteners actually contributed to obesity and Type 2 diabetes.
The IDFA and NMPF argue “that the proposed amendments to the milk standard of identity would promote honesty and fair dealing in the marketplace” yet they don’t want changes to the labels on dairy products.
Accordingly, the petitioners state that milk flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners should be labeled as milk without further claims so that consumers can “more easily identify its overall nutritional value.”
It’s unclear how consumers can more easily identify the overall nutritional value of milk products that are flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners without labels.
Quoting Section 130.10 of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, the dairy giants claim a new label is not required because sugar is added to milk without labeling it, and “the modified food is not inferior in performance” and “‘reduced calorie’ (labels) are not attractive to children” so marketing as such is of no benefit or detriment.
The FDA has opened public comments until May 21 for anyone interested to “submit comments, data, and information concerning the need for, and the appropriateness of, amending the standard of identity for milk and the additional dairy standards.”
To submit a formal comment or send data to the FDA concerning adding aspartame and other artificial sweeteners to milk products CLICK HERE.
Read other articles from Activist Post Here.
Over 315 of 450 Tested Plastic Containers Leach Hormone-Like Compounds
by Elizabeth Renter
Natural Society
February 22, 2013
When the industry found consumers getting hip to BPA and its hormone disrupting qualities, they started looking at alternatives. While that was nice and all, the alternatives aren’t much better. In fact, some research found that mot plastics, even those that are BPA-free, still leach hormone-mimicking chemicals when exposed to normal conditions. While the research took play a couple years ago, it reminds us to think twice when using and purchasing plastics.
Despite that the industry would like you to think “BPA-Free” labels make foods safe from hormone disrupters, researchers say that simply isn’t the case. They tested more than 450 different plastic containers from stores like Walmart and Whole Foods. More than 70% of them released estrogen-like chemicals.
The containers they tested included those most likely to come in contact with food. Plastic bags, baby bottles, deli containers, and reusable plastic food containers were all tested. Because they knew BPA-containers would emit hormone-disrupters, they focused on those plastics that claimed to be “BPA-free”.
When exposed to saltwater and alcohol, the majority of the plastics released hormone disrupting chemicals. The number increased when they were put in the dishwasher, exposed to sunlight, or used in the microwave. These exposures are just the type that these plastics would undergo if used in your home.
Related: What do plastic recycling symbols mean? Find out which plastics are safest and which you should not use.
“Then, you greatly increase the probability that you’re going to get chemicals having estrogenic activity released,” said Professor of Biology George Bittner, adding that they increased the number of containers emitting hormone disrupters to 90%.
The study didn’t focus on health effects as much as the chemicals that the containers produced. Some scientists would argue that these disrupters aren’t proven to do any damage to humans, only mice and rats. Others say Bittner’s research isn’t completely reliable. But iIf a chemical causes infertility and cancer in rats, I don’t want to touch it.
However, those that have questioned BPA-effects before are welcoming the study.
“This is really helpful because they took a look at very common products,” says Sonya Lunder of the Environmental Working Group.
It seems when the scientific world is presented with studies like this, we are encouraged to continue on with business as usual until they know, without a doubt, that something is 100% likely to cause cancer, illness, death, or the like. While they may be convinced our retail habits are more important than our health, I’d like to think our informed readers know otherwise.
Additional Sources:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222987/
Other Important Stories
Transparent mobile phone developed by US company [video]
TheGuardian
February 20, 2013
An US technology firm says it has created a transparent mobile phone whose technology rivals that of current smartphones. The device, developed by Polytron Technologies, is made of conductive glass which is scratch and shatter resistant. No price has yet been announced for the phone, which should go on sale within the year.
[hat tip: Jason Bermas]
VIDEO — Is Your ‘Beef’ Really Horse and Donkey Meat?
The Truther Girls
February 19, 2013
All over the UK and Europe, horse and donkey meat is turning up in ‘beef’. What else don’t we know about what is in our food?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ne…
http://abcnews.go.com/International/h…
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic…
Extra-caffeinated soda and chemical sweeteners for breakfast? PepsiCo introduces ‘Kickstart’ soda for people who absolutely hate themselves
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
February 19, 2013
(NaturalNews) Ah, there’s nothing like a heavy dose of caffeine, corn syrup and highly acidic phosphoric acid in the morning. And bringing it to you is none other than PepsiCo, the company that habitually uses aspartame, MSG and GMOs across its product line. Apparently drinking an aspartame-laced, caffeine-spiked soda for lunch and dinner isn’t enough: PepsiCo wants to own your breakfast, too.
This new “Kickstart” soda reportedly is made with 5% juice (meaning it’s 95% corn syrup, phosphoric acid and other ingredients). But here’s where the laughter really begins: According to the FDA, a beverage containing at least 5% juice isn’t considered a “soda.” It’s actually JUICE!
Yep, this means Kickstart can be served to your children in public school, because it’s “not soda” according to the agreement between the FDA and the soda industry.
Except, of course, it is 95% soda. But that doesn’t count by the FDA’s “new math” in which 5 > 95.
Artificial sweeteners, too
Oh, it gets even better. Kickstart is formulated with artificial chemical sweeteners from the start. And it has more caffeine than a can of Mountain Dew, clocking in at 92 milligrams per 16 ounces.
Hold on, let me get this straight: A liquid concoction spiked with caffeine, chemical sweeteners, phosphoric acid and corn syrup is now “juice” according to the soda industry? Yep!
Does this mean NY mayor Michael Bloomberg will let you buy an extra large cup of it? Does the “5% juice” get retailers off the hook if they want to sell large quantities?
Overall, I’m not sure who’s more stupid in all this: The company making it, the government agency regulating it, or the people buying and drinking it. To me, it all seems to be a collision of caffeinated morons. What kind of fool wants to wake up in the morning and chemically kick themselves in the b#lls while ingesting phosphoric acid, an extra dose of caffeine and synthetic chemical sweeteners?
Can you say, “Kickstart diabetes?”
Big Pharma and the entire health care industry will be thanking PepsiCo big time for this one. If Kickstart catches on, America can fully expect to be financially suffocated under a wave of bank-busting obesity and diabetes for generations to come. This is a great time to buy more PepsiCo stock, because if there’s one thing Americans all agree on, it’s that our retirement accounts should financially benefit from the companies that are destroying our children.
P.S. I invented my own soda called Monster Chemo Agent Orange Diet Fluoride Soda! Here’s the advertisement:
Source:
ABC News:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57568740/pepsico-introduces-mo…
Breathtaking Electromagnetic Solar Surface Event – NASA SDO/AIA [video]
Suspicious0bservers
February 19, 2013
Today’s 3Min News: http://youtu.be/R8PbSzOKkQA
Solar Data:
Helioveiwer: http://delphi.nascom.nasa.gov
SDO: http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/
2/17/2013 — Florida Fireballs / Meteors – Large RADAR returns over 1000+ Sq. Miles [video]
Dutchsinse
February 17, 2013
msm stories here: http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Po…
and here:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50843785/ns…
radar for key west here:
http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/nexrad/…
also view back dated NEXRAD RADAR for key west here:
http://vortex.plymouth.edu/gen_nids.c…
solarimg caught it here:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb…
and here:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb…
1km and 2km visible satellite and infrared images here:
