VIDEO — Turkey’s False Flag Plan: What you’re not being told
The Eyeopener with James Corbett
Apr 2, 2014
Late last week, a conversation between high-ranking Turkish officials was leaked online purporting to expose a plan that had been devised to use a staged attack on a Turkish target in Aleppo as a pretext to start a war with Syria. Where does this recording come from? Who released it and why? What does this mean for the future of Turkish politics and the future of the Syrian war? Join us this week on the BoilingFrogsPost.com Eyeopener report as we explore these questions and get to the bottom of the false flag leak.
SUPPORT BFP: http://ur1.ca/ge4h7
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=8975
VIDEO — How to Steal an Airplane: From 9/11 to MH370
Corbett Report
Mar 19, 2014
Now that the MSM is flirting with the idea of “cyber hijacking” in the increasingly desperate search for MH370, many are left wondering how long the possibility of a remote control hijack has been possible and why the public hasn’t been warned of this threat. Join us for this week’s BoilingFrogsPost.com Eyeopener report as we examine the cyber hijacking issue and its connections to 9/11.
SUPPORT BFP: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/suppo…
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=8886
[related links:
- Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 now clearly a government cover-up: All evidence contradicts official story
- Hunt for Malaysian airliner shifts following new leads
- Malaysian Airlines Flight 370: The Complete Timeline And Infographic
- VIDEO — Malaysian Airline Disappearance One Bizarre Theory – Pete Papaherakles
- VIDEO — Flight 370 my 2 cents]
Watch This Teacher: “Preaching Crazy Conspiracy Theories” — video included
by Mac Slavo
Activist Post
Feb 22, 2014
Jason Glicker is a substitute teacher at Grosse Pointe North High School in Detroit, MI.
He recently had a discussion with his students about various topics that include September 11th, World War II, and false flag terror attacks. What makes Mr. Glicker’s approach a bit different from anything his students have ever heard before is that he doesn’t exactly subscribe to the “official” stories surrounding these historical events.
Rather than following textbook curriculum, Glicker chose to share some alternative ideas. One of his students happened to capture it all on video and share it on the Internet. Now, parents and mainstream media outlets are up in arms, because according to them, his theories are a bit “bizarre.”
Substitute teacher taped spouting BIZARRE conspiracy theories in high school physics class
A student at a public, taxpayer-funded high school in Michigan has clandestinely filmed a substitute teacher preaching crazy conspiracy theories in front of a high school physics class last month.
Note that The Daily Caller takes special care to let you know that this is a “public” and “taxpayer” funded institution. We’re not exactly sure why that’s important, but apparently if taxpayers are paying for it, then there can be no open discourse or theoretical discussions about any topic except for what the government and teachers’ unions authorize.
The “crazy conspiracy” theories that can be heard on the video include suggestions that 9-11 may have involved members of Pakistani intelligence services who were funded by the CIA and brainwashing of the terrorists involved.
Glicker also went so far as to suggest that President Roosevelt and members of the military had foreknowledge of an impending Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, something that has actually been verified by countless independent sources and recently made into a documentary by the BBC.
He also mentioned that governments are often complicit in attacks that are seemingly executed by the enemy, though are often funded or organized by the very people who then point fingers at others. It’s another “conspiracy theory” validated by decades of facts including the Reichstag fire that gave the Nazis a leg up in Germany and the completely staged Gulf of Tonkin incident cited as the start of the Vietnam war.
Other topics discussed include the crazy notion that the United States sold guns to Mexican drug cartels in something called Operation Fast and Furious, as well as the Iran/Contra affair in which agents of the U.S. government facilitated the sale of weapons to Iran.
Here’s video of the “incident”:
(Video via The Daily Sheeple)
The student who recorded the video was later quoted as saying, “it is inappropriate for him [Glicker] to indoctrinate students without facts or logical discussion, especially in a physics class.” It is, however, apparently appropriate for this Mensa candidate to have his cell phone on and recording during physics class. We’re sure this particular social networking butterfly would prefer to spend his time working advanced theoretical equations that he can then post on his Facebook page or YouTube channel for all the world to see.
Of course, the “facts” in all of the aforementioned events are not only disputed, but logical discussions about them are widely available all over the Internet, something this particular student could have easily accessed on the very cell phone with which he recorded the lecture.
“I like it when kids are engaged and they’re actually interested if I have something to say, they seem like they want to hear it. I will definitely tell them,” said Glicker when asked about his non-traditional method of teaching.
The real indoctrination, at least for the student who caught this on video, has been successfully fulfilled and he can now join the ranks of his fellow police statists currently being educated throughout America.
It’s shameful, but unfortunately a sign of our times, that anyone who questions the status quo and the official story is subjected to public ridicule by the very people who are supposed to investigate and keep our government in check.
Had anyone in the mainstream media, or the student who made the video, taken just a single hour to open their minds to other possibilities they would have learned that most of Glicker’s theories have, if nothing else, at least some semblance of fact and credibility.
Of course, this is the new America, where free thought and open discussion are relics of a bygone era.
Hattip The Organic Prepper
You can read more from Mac Slavo at his site SHTFplan.com, where this first appeared.
Latest ‘Domestic Terror’ Sniper Attack in California is Likely a Government False Flag
RELATED: False Flag: New Details Emerge on Santa Clara County ‘Military-Style’ Power Grid Attack
21st Century Wire says…
[Feb 8, 2014]
It’s phenomenal story on paper, but when you read between the lines, it’s almost 100% certain that this latest ‘domestic terror’ event in the Silicon Valley, Northern California was a government-sanctioned operation.
This attack happened nine months ago in April 2013, but was only publicly acknowledged by authorities this week.
The Wall Street Journal reports that a former Federal Energy Regulatory Commission chairman Jon Wellinghoff has finally admitted that a group of snipers shot up PG&E Corp.’s Metcalf transmission substation, located inside Santa Clara County, last year in 2013.The attack was incredibly quick and executed with total precision – an attack which lasted only 19 minutes. In that short space of time the shooters were able to knock out 17 transformers causing a power-down and a closure of that power station.
According to Wellinghoff, the attack was “the most significant incident of domestic terrorism involving the grid that has ever occurred (in the U.S.)”.
Some of the evidence found at the scene included more than 100 fingerprint-free shell casings, as well as a small piles of rocks, “that appeared to have been left by an advance scout to tell the attackers where to get the best shots.”
The talking points surrounding this story are predictable – led by calls for “a tighter security envelope around our nation’s infrastructure”, followed by, “why isn’t the federal government doing more to protect us?”
Another security breach, right?
If you consider the obvious probability that a team of snipers that well organised and effective would be a highly trained group of shooters (most likely trained military assets), then this naturally points right back to the US government as the prime suspect for this attack.
The mainstream media and some alternative media outlets are reporting this as a “real terror attack on US soil”, but have yet to reason what the motive would be in this conspiracy to take out a power station – we say conspiracy because authorities clearly admit that this was an organised team effort – and definitely the work of trained professionals.
This event can only be described then, as a false flag attack on American soil.
What is the motive? Authorities would to have the public believe that the motive is that a few civilian men wanted to combine target practice with fomenting general chaos.
Who would be the beneficiaries of an incident like this? Top of the list would be the Department of Homeland Security who is desperate to retain its incredible tranche of funding at a time when a number of federal budgets are being slashed. Next would be those involved in the corporate protection rackets like those major insurance companies who sell premiums to municipalities and large retail energy suppliers.
Rounding out the list of potential beneficiaries, you cannot forget about President Obama’s Department of Justice, currently run by an Attorney General Eric Holder, who has professed his own agenda for eliminating private ownership of fire arms – especially high-powered rifles, in America. Incidents like this only embolden men like AG Holder who believe the public must be ‘brainwashed’ to accept the agenda. We refer back to his speech on gun control here:
Those who still believe that this was the work of a home-grown terror cell, read between their own lines: according to the U.S. Navy investigation ordered at the request of FERC chairman Wellinghoff, “it was a targeting package just like they would put together for an attack”.
‘Just like they would put together for a real attack’, he says?
Exactly, because this wasn’t a real terror attack.
READ MORE WAR ON TERROR NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire War on Terror Files
–
VIDEO — Supreme Court Justice Warns FEMA Camps Are Coming
Truthstream Media
Feb 4, 2014
http://truthstreammedia.com/supreme-c…
Martial Law has already been established on paper, and a Supreme Court Justice now warns that the nation’s highest court would back executive orders to intern Americans, as it did during WWII.
Senior Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, the longest serving justice of the Supreme Court who has been on since the Reagan Administration, predicted that the Supreme Court would someday back moves by the federal government to intern Americans under martial law, citing the landmark Korematsu v. United States decision that upheld FDR’s Executive Order 9066 to round up and hold Japanese Americans in camps during WWII.
Never mind that this is blatantly in violation of the rights of Americans; time of war makes the laws fell silent Scalia cautioned.
How quickly would the Obama Administration or a future president use the powers of Executive Order to hold Americans in actual camps in the event of future crisis — be it natural disaster, false flag terrorism, economic collapse or wider war?
Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/justice…
Related
http://truthstreammedia.com/just-anot…
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/…
Website: TruthstreamMedia.com
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
FB: Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
9/11 Truther Seizes Mic During MVP’s Superbowl Victory Speech — videos included
by Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton
Activist Post
Feb 3, 2014
Behind the scenes, head of coach of Seattle’s winning team already posed 9/11 truth questions to a top Pentagon official and lead general in the Iraq War: were the September 11 attacks planned or faked by the United States government?
In an unexpected moment during MVP Malcolm Smith’s speech after the Seattle Seahawks blowout at the Superbowl last night, something even more unexpected happened – an actual important issue was brought up.
During the otherwise typical player press conference, an unidentified 9/11 truther suddenly grabbed the mic to interject on a heavily watched international news feed “Investigate 9/11. 9/11 was perpetrated by people within our own government.” Reports confirm that it went out live; video was captured of the incident on ESPN.
The bold man was quickly ushered offstage, with a stunned Malcolm Smith asking “Is everybody alright?” before joking “check his press pass.”
[…CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE]
[related:
New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile
PressTV
July 12, 2013
The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”
In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.
Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”
Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”
In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.
DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.
Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.
In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.
The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:
“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”
But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.
No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.
[h/t: GeoEngineering Watch]
PN 