NYC Plans to Turn 7,500 Payphones Into WiFi Hot Spots Despite Health and Privacy Risks
via Activist Post
by Kevin Samson
Jan 3, 2016
Awareness continues to increase surrounding the health dangers of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) emanating from our daily gadgets, as well as from the rise of the Smart Grid. For example, a prominent neuroscientist went on record in a lecture to the medical community itself where he exposed the many health risks as well as an industry-wide attempt by telecom to cover up the negative consequences. A world-renown biochemist is seeking to abolish WiFi in schools. And a British ER physician has made it her mission to educate people about what steps they can take to minimize exposure and damage to WiFi. A slew of peer-review scientific studies support the warnings of these experts.
So what happens when your entire city becomes one giant WiFi signal? Major cities have been planning to do just that, and their plans are now ready to become reality.
Telecom giant Virgin Media announced a pilot program in October to implement “discreet street furniture” and the “UK’s first Smart Pavement” in Chesham, a city of 21,000 people. They stated that their plans were ultimately far more ambitious, seeking “to build more networks like this across the UK.”
But when New York City signs on to pervasive WiFi, we really should pay attention.
The city already has erected one 9-foot-tall structure that is an indication of the rollout of 7,500 WiFi hot spots, which are slated to go online early in 2016. It is part of the LinkNYC program (“Faster Than a New York Minute,” har har) which proclaims to become “the fastest and largest municipal WiFi network in the world.”
[…CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE]
Jackals and Giraffes: The Weapon of Non-Violent Communication
via Renegade Tribune
by James Bronson
Aug 16, 2015
The terms ‘violence’ and ‘non-violence’ exist as almost an artificial dichotomy that can be manipulated by playing one against the other. We’ve been conditioned to view both functions (linguistically) as separate and at this stage of American discourse, not equal. Since these are the ‘rules of the game’ (because in all honesty, it’s a well-blended, non-dialectic set of techniques that truly works and ultimately can’t be planned for), we’ll still use these two popular terms for discussion to make things simple.
Violence is defined as ‘aggressive physical action’ or force used to cause physical damage or injury.
Non-violence (which is incorrectly described by Wikipedia as a ‘Sanskrit’ word) is a form of perceivable ‘non-action’ (considered ‘harmless’) or mental manipulation that plays on the feelings and sympathies of others, in order to affect changes in line with the non-violent actor’s agenda.
Modern non-violent philosophy can be traced to such luminaries at Gene Sharp, who was often employed by the military (yes the military), to use non-violent methods to topple governments. [Ref]
[…CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE]
[hat tip: Jan Irvin]
PN 