HIGHLY POTENT NEWS THAT MIGHT CHANGE YOUR VIEWS

health

VIDEO — #MarchAgainstMonsanto: The Grassroots Uprising

Global Research TV
May 25, 2013

Monsanto is a company feared and reviled by the public in equal measure. But whatever cases Monsanto has lost in the court of public opinion it has made up for in the courts of justice thanks to its revolving door with the upper reaches of Washington. Now, a new movement is seeking to galvanize grassroots resistance to the corporation, and derail its agenda. Find out more in this week’s Backgrounder from Global Research TV.


VIDEO — Monsanto GMO Crops and The Clarks Companies in ONTARIO

by Frankie Gotz
Canadian Awareness Network

May 25, 2013

THE CLARK COMPANIES  is well known corporation in it’s local domain within Haldimand County and the surrounding area. THE CLARK COMPANIES head office is in Caledonia Ontario and is made of a family of Canadian companies located in Southern Ontario, involved in many aspects of agricultural production and related agriculture-business world wide.

This corporation is one of it’s biggest kinds in Canada, they produce a lot of food in meat and crop. largest producer of poultry in Canada and they sell seeds to thousands of farmers that supply crops for the food industry.  It just so happens that CLARKS sells Genetically Modified Crops short form is GM Crops.

GM Crops are genetically modified organisms. These crops are the result of a laboratory process of taking genes from one species and inserting them into another species, splicing and mixing DNA.  It is done so the plant can produce it’s own insecticide or be able to live in conditions such as tolerating large amounts of herbicides such as RoundUp which is exactly the type of GM crop CLARK’s sells.

Monsanto is the corporation that first genetically engineered corn in the 1990′s so that it could be resistant to the company’s herbicide “RoundUp”.  That means one can spray as much RoundUp around their crop and it will have no effect on it because the GMO corn has the DNA of glyphosate,  the active ingredient in RoundUp, combined in with the DNA with the GMO corn, and that is why they are resistant to the herbicide roundup.

GMOs are not good for our health.  They can cause Food Allergies.  Some plants produce toxins but the levels are too low to damage humans.  GM a plant can increase toxicity in plants and studies have shown that by consuming GMO plants people are risking Antibiotic resistance, meaning GM plant can be tested by growing it in a solution containing the corresponding antibiotic. If the plant survives scientists know that it has taken up the antibiotic resistance gene along with the desired gene. There is concern that bacteria living in the guts of humans and animals could pick up an antibiotic resistance gene from a GM plant before the DNA becomes completely digested .

A presentation at a news conference in London with
Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen and colleagues said rats fed on a diet containing NK603 – a seed variety made tolerant to dousings of Roundup – or given water containing Roundup at levels permitted in the United States died earlier than those on a standard diet.
The animals on the GM diet suffered mammary tumours, as well as severe liver and kidney damage.

In my opinion it is hard to find organic corn in these days.  Clarks and other companies sell genetically modified corn that can tolerate Monsanto’s herbicide known as roundup and millions of people are consuming them and they don’t even know it.

Also the herbicide RoundUp itself has dangers to be used in fields.  A recent peer-review study published by scientists Anthony Samsel  and Stephanie Seneff in the Entropy Journal on April 18th 2013, suggests that heavy use of Roundup, could lead to health problems such as gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease,

So eating GM crop alone is unhealthy but with the combination of RoundUp ingredients being in the soil and on the plant itself is a combination of death.

I wish farmers would just pay alittle more and go all organic so we can all eat healthy.  Its all up to the farmers in the end to take care of health needs.  If they’re not doing their job right then they should retire from their positions.

In some parts of the European Union growing GM crops have been banned.

In Canada we are fighting hard to label them but it seems there isn’t enough effort being pushed to ban them.

Heirloom or heritage seeds are seeds that have been kept and bred before all GMO and hybrids came into existence. The corn supply has become nearly extinct.

FrankieGotz@hotmail.com
twitter.com/FrankieGotz
facebook.com/FrankieGotz
youtube.com/FrankieGotz


VIDEO — ‘Monsanto monopoly pushes farmers to suicide’

Russia Today
May 25, 2013

Nick Bernabe, who’s a social media director for March against Monsanto, claims in some parts of the world the corporate giant’s tactics are even leading farmers to suicide.

FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES of the global protest organized by the ‘March Against Monsanto’ movement: http://on.rt.com/1hmc5w

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 500 million YouTube views benchmark.


VIDEO — Toppling The Monsanto Pyramid!

Press For Truth
May 24, 2013

Monsanto’s days are numbered. The time has come to put an end to Monsanto’s reign of power. Join the food revolution on May 25th. Together we march for freedom…together we march to put Monsanto on notice that free human being from all over the world will no longer support their monopoly. Join us on May 25th. We the people have the power. We the people have had enough of Monsanto’s reckless behavior.On May 25th We the people together will topple the Monsanto pyramid.

Visit the March-Against-Monsanto website:
http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/

Visit the March Against Monsanto Facebook Group:
https://www.facebook.com/MarchAgainst…

Find a March Against Monsanto rally near you:
http://www.march-against-monsanto.com…

Support independent media by contributing to the PFT Fundraiser: http://www.gofundme.com/2sghd4
or
Donate through Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr…


Adam Kokesh RELEASED

via Twitter / adamkokesh
May 24, 2013


Portland Voters Reject Water Fluoridation for the Fourth Time

Late Tuesday night over 60 percent of Portland area voters rejected a proposal to begin fluoridating the city’s water supply.

Photo: AP/Don Ryan

Photo: AP/Don Ryan

by Derrick Broze
Intellihub.com

May 24, 2013

Mayor Charlie Hales expressed his disappointment in a statement. “The measure lost despite my own ‘yes’ vote.That’s sure disappointing, but I accept the will of the voters.”

Portland voters first turned down fluoridation when the process began in the 1950′s, and again during the 1960′s. It was briefly approved in 1978, however that plan was overturned two years later, before any fluoride was ever added to the water.

After rumors of backroom deals between the City Council and fluoridation supporters emerged, clean water activists sprung to action. In response to last years city council vote to begin fluoridating water serving 900,000 citizens, protestors organized efforts to bring the issue to the public for a vote. After gathering over 40,000 signatures the measure was brought forth.

The issue also wound up politicizing a statewide health report  that showed falling cavity and tooth decay rates in the state over the past five years. One of the report’s authors said she felt pressure by Upstream Health, the group spearheading fluoridation efforts, to present the findings in a certain way.

Oregon Live covered the details  of the report:

“The percentage of children who already had a cavity fell from 64 to 52 statewide, according to the survey. That represents a drop of nearly one-fifth.

The percentage of children with untreated decay also declined from 36 to 20 statewide, the survey found. That’s down by nearly half.
And the other major measure, rampant decay — which is defined as seven treated or untreated cavities — fell from 20 percent to 14 percent statewide. That’s down by about one-third. “

With this latest rejection Portland becomes the largest city in the United States that does not add fluoride to the water. Speaking to the Portland Tribune, Kim Kaminski, leader of Clean Water Portland said, “At a very fundamental level, people understand that we don’t want more chemicals in our water.”

This year marks the 68th anniversary of fluoridation – the first U.S. city to adjust the fluoride levels in its water supply was Grand Rapids, Mich. on January 25, 1945, according to the American Dental Association.

Despite the fact that most mainstream health organizations, including the American Medical Association, endorse fluoridation over 200 communities have rejected the practice in recent years. Opponents of fluoridation in Portland worry by adding fluoride to the water it will ruin the city’s famously pristine water supply, as well as violate an individuals civil liberties, by forced medicating through the water.

Portlands stance against water fluoridation has become an attacking point for many publications around the country. Accusations of being anti-science, or a conspiracy theorist abound for those opposing the controversial practice.

Despite a recent Salon article that claims the Fluoride Free movement is “Without a study to stand on” there are a number of studies that show a variety of health concerns . The article also states, “The (fluoride) ion occurs naturally in ground water in varying levels, some that are in fact too high.” While this claim is true it is also misleading.

When a city chooses to add “fluoride” to the water supply they are actually adding the toxic substance hydrofluorosilic acid. Hydrofluorosilic acid is a by-product of phosphate mining, and if not for cities purchasing the substance for millions of dollars, it would have to be disposed of at a hefty cost to the producer.

The history books are filled with examples of medical and scientific practices that were seen as safe at one point only to be demonized later. The early critics of any common practice are often ridiculed until new evidence creates a shift in understanding and future practices. When it comes to water fluoridation we are dealing with a similar situation.

For more information on the dangers of water fluoridation and how you can get involved please check out the Fluoride Action Network. (www.fluoridealert.org)

sources:

^http://www.seattlepi.com/news/medical/article/Portland-Ore-rejecting-water-fluoridation-4535706.php#ixzz2UB34ZyOK

^http://portlandtribune.com/pt/9-news/153165-inspired-water-fight-sends-message


Student Experiment Finds Plants Won’t Grow Near Wi-Fi Router

via Zen Gardner
Before It’s News

May 23, 2013

Ninth-graders design science experiment to test the effect of cellphone radiation on plants. The results may surprise you.

Photo courtesy of Kim Horsevad, teacher at Hjallerup Skole in Denmark.

Five ninth-grade young women from Denmark recently created a science experiment that is causing a stir in the scientific community.
It started with an observation and a question. The girls noticed that if they slept with their mobile phones near their heads at night, they often had difficulty concentrating at school the next day. They wanted to test the effect of a cellphone’s radiation on humans, but their school, Hjallerup School in Denmark, did not have the equipment to handle such an experiment. So the girls designed an experiment that would test the effect of cellphone radiation on a plant instead.
The students placed six trays filled with Lepidium sativum, a type of garden cress into a room without radiation, and six trays of the seeds into another room next to two routers that according to the girls calculations, emitted about the same type of radiation as an ordinary cellphone.
Over the next 12 days, the girls observed, measured, weighed and photographed their results. Although by the end of the experiment the results were blatantly obvious — the cress seeds placed near the router had not grown. Many of them were completely dead. While the cress seeds planted in the other room, away from the routers, thrived.
The experiment earned the girls (pictured below) top honors in a regional science competition and the interest of scientists around the world.
Teens involved in plants and cellphone experiment, Hjallerup Skole
According to Kim Horsevad, a teacher at Hjallerup Skole in Denmark were the cress experiment took place, a neuroscience professor at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, is interested in repeating the experiment in controlled professional scientific environments.